Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi threat to withdraw billions in US investments
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 08/20/2002 | Simon English

Posted on 08/19/2002 4:51:41 PM PDT by Pokey78

Saudi's richest investors are threatening to pull billions of dollars out of America in anger at suggestions they helped fund Osama bin Laden.

A lawsuit filed by relatives of 900 people who were killed in the September 11 attacks is provoking fury among wealthy Saudis.

The suit filed in a Washington court last week seeking damages of $100,000 billion names three members of the Saudi royal family, including defence minister Prince Sultan bin abd al-Aziz al Saud.

The lawsuit alleges that Saudi money has "for years been funnelled to encourage radical anti-Americanism as well as to fund the al Qaeda terrorists".

Banks and charities named in the suit are calling on Saudi Arabia to review its financial and political ties to the US.

Bishr Bakheet of the Bakheet Financial Consultancy said: "Naming Prince Sultan is the equivalent of saying J Edgar Hoover was a communist spy. Assuming the court proceeds with this lawsuit, the Saudi investment community, already in shock, will start withdrawing their money. People are really going to walk out."

This threat comes as foreign investment in the US dries up because of business scandals, lower corporate earnings and the collapse of the technology boom. According to government figures, foreigners put $124 billion into the US last year, down from $301 billion in 2000.

Economists say the reluctance of wealthy outsiders to expand their business interests in America is a major threat to the world's largest economy.

Saudi investors have $750 billion in the US. A mass walkout would seriously impede the US's attempts to pull away from recession.

A spokesman for the Al Rajhi Investment and Development Corporation, a bank named in the lawsuit, said: "This is an act to extort Saudi money deposited in the United States and a way of meddling in the region."

Fifteen of the 19 hijackers involved in the September assaults have been identified as Saudi, though the government has repeatedly denied any involvement.

Muslim groups in both Saudi Arabia and Britain believe there is a media campaign against the kingdom aimed at pressuring it to support an attack on Iraq.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Dark Wing
We're so scared.
21 posted on 08/19/2002 6:22:51 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
A spokesman for the Al Rajhi Investment and Development Corporation, a bank named in the lawsuit, said: "This is an act to extort Saudi money deposited in the United States and a way of meddling in the region."

Saudi Arabia, you haven't seen meddling yet. Wait till we start bombing.

22 posted on 08/19/2002 6:23:43 PM PDT by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
$750 Billion isn't even 1% of the US market...microsoft alone is $300 billion.

In other words we could afford to have two companies like Microsoft completely leave the US market with less of an impact on our economy and jobs, than would result if the Saudis pulled their investments.
That's comforting.

23 posted on 08/19/2002 6:25:35 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Pay em in Saudi Script
24 posted on 08/19/2002 6:31:13 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Saudi investors have $750 billion in the US.

It's $750 billion of our own money, come back home to roost. If we retake our oilfields, the Saudis will be back to cooking scorpion stew over a camel crap fire, and praying the next sandstorm doesn't blow them halfway to Haifa.

25 posted on 08/19/2002 6:36:30 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
1. If they quit, everyone will ride the prices down, so they will be selling at a discount.

2.What ever they get, they put it into a fund/back, whatever. Naturally this fund/bank will be looking for good buys-like U.S. investments that have dropped in price. So, the money comes back.

3. The political situation will become so uncertain that money worldwide will fly to security, like US Treasury notes.

4. Frankly, a lot of rich, fat, no account Saudis are going to keep, if not increase their investments. Saudi Arabia will go tapioca before the US ever does. Look for Beverley Hills mansion prices to skyrocket.

26 posted on 08/19/2002 6:38:53 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
The word is 'sequestration'. And I completely agree with you.

Sequestration of enemy assets is incredibly and immediately effective.

Give the Saudis 96 hours to surrender all the supposed Al-Qaeda 'fighters' they've 'captured' (what a crock), suspend ALL asset transfers as of the very minute of the announcement, and when they don't comply (and ALSO allow use of their physical facilities to the US Armed Forces regarding Hussein and his Ba'athists), sequester all Saudi assets.

Probably the highly predatory Swiss will go along with this, perhaps even (no bets) the Dutch. The Brits certainly will, New Labour are **desperate** for revenue to maintain their idiotic welfare-state posture.

27 posted on 08/19/2002 6:41:49 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
The word is 'sequestration'. And I completely agree with you.

Sequestration of enemy assets is incredibly and immediately effective.

Give the Saudis 96 hours to surrender all the supposed Al-Qaeda 'fighters' they've 'captured' (what a crock), suspend ALL asset transfers as of the very minute of the announcement, and when they don't comply (and ALSO allow use of their physical facilities to the US Armed Forces regarding Hussein and his Ba'athists), sequester all Saudi assets.

Probably the highly predatory Swiss will go along with this, perhaps even (no bets) the Dutch. The Brits certainly will, New Labour are **desperate** for revenue to maintain their idiotic welfare-state posture.

28 posted on 08/19/2002 6:41:50 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It could just as easily backfire on them. Throw $750 billion worth of stock and real estate on the market and the overall price will go down, true, but there's also going to be a reactive frenzy of buying and a resulting stimulation of the economy that they're trying to depress. And they'll have to find somewhere to put $750 billion that won't also react negatively - throw that money into the EU markets suddenly, say, and what happens? The prices go up. And then? Inflation, further loss of productivity, increased cost of EU goods, and resulting degradation of EU competitiveness in the international market. Let's face it, you don't throw that kind of money around lightly without risking a huge loss.

I think the point is that they'd rather do so than lose it in a lawsuit, which is natural enough. But the reason that this sort of economic warfare hasn't become common is the prohibitive price the manipulator has to pay for manipulating the victim's economy.

29 posted on 08/19/2002 6:42:33 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Apologies to all for the double post!

Either kbd bounce or a nervous disorder on my part (g!).

30 posted on 08/19/2002 6:43:35 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
You are mistaken, sir. On December 9, 1944, after the Swiss had refused to stop allowing transshipment of military materiel through their nation in exchange for Nazi coal, FDR froze ('sequestered' is the proper term) ALL Swiss assets in the U.S. The next day, all the Allied Powers followed suit. It took exactly 9 days for the Swiss to cooperate.

As Casey Stengel, the old Yankee maanger, used to say: 'Ya could look it up.'

31 posted on 08/19/2002 6:48:56 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Saudi's richest investors are threatening to pull billions of dollars out of America..."

Dont talk about it...Do it!

32 posted on 08/19/2002 6:53:38 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
You are mistaken, sir. On December 9, 1944, after the Swiss had refused to stop allowing transshipment of military materiel through their nation in exchange for Nazi coal....

You're talking about a World War over a half a century ago..and comparing the Saudi situation to the Nazis...and this is supposed to be a convincing argument. LOL

33 posted on 08/19/2002 7:00:08 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
You know, it is so odd. The parts for all their military hardware they bought from us just tripled in price.

They don't seem to work quite right either.

34 posted on 08/19/2002 7:01:37 PM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
When will President Bush simply announce publicly that the Saudis are our enemy??


35 posted on 08/19/2002 7:17:53 PM PDT by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
"Suspend ALL asset transfers as of the very minute of the announcement, and when they don't comply (and ALSO allow use of their physical facilities to the US Armed Forces regarding Hussein and his Ba'athists), sequester all Saudi assets..."

And I concur....

The US should have no qualms at all implementing into action your suggested plan. In fact the Saudis should consider themselves lucky if this was the only extent of a retributive phase regarding their blatant and overt support of terrorism aimed at America.

As for the Euro-wusses, the only ones worth consulting with on any basis are the Brits.

36 posted on 08/19/2002 7:40:24 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JimVT
Where they gonna put it?

Tokyo.

37 posted on 08/19/2002 8:15:02 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Supposing they already TRIED to get their cash out..out of enron, worldcom, global crossing etc last spring...gives a new thought to "motive"....
38 posted on 08/19/2002 8:15:33 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wonder if the Saudi money in the US is why Bush has been kissing up to them instead of say launching a surprise night paratrooper attack and seizing the oilfields followed by a general invasion and destruction of the Wahabbi cult and House of Saud. Thd DOW dropped about 1000 points on the Friday and Monday BEFORE 9/11 I think its because the Saudis were selling short I think they knew all about it in advance. Damn Ive been on FR too long Im starting to grow tinfoil on my head.
39 posted on 08/20/2002 12:03:34 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
You assume the idiots in our government know what assets are owned by the Saudis Im sure that most of what the Saudi have invested goes through about 100 intermediaries.
40 posted on 08/20/2002 12:08:53 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson