Posted on 08/19/2002 5:48:34 AM PDT by one2many
<!-- a{text-decoration:none} //-->
CONTENT="">
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
"Hard Drinkin' Lincoln" bump...
The number of Confederates courts-martialed for for rape:
Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. None.
Rape wasn't a crime in the confederate army, was it?
It's 2002. Time to live in the present for a change.
Maybe for the south, it was not a court martial worthy offense. I wouldn't know, and don't really care. It was hundreds of years ago.
The only difference between the union & confederate versions was the substitution of "Confederate" for "United".
Looks like the Articles of War meant about as much to the confederate leadership as the confederate constitution did.
After the blacks get their reparations checks, look for the Mexicans in this country - even the illegal ones - to demand reparations for having the Southwest "stolen" from them.
If the blacks think they have white hostility now, wait until they've bilked their neighbors, co-workers, friends, etc. in such a scam like this one. I don't want to be around when the race riots reignite; damn glad I live in the country with dogs and guns.
Nonsense. If anything, it serves as a distinction that under the existing Articles of War that civilian crimes could not be tried in military courts/tribunals. At that time failure of the commanding officer to deliver the suspect in question to civil authorities was itself an offense under Article 33:
If any commanding officer or officers shall wilfully neglect, or shall refuse, upon the application aforesaid, to deliver over such accused person or persons to the civil magestrate, or to be aiding and assisting to the officers of justice in apprehending such person or persons, the officer or officers so offending shall be cashiered.
Nevertheless, at the time (November 1861) the Confederate Congress had not authorized military courts to try such cases, that was remedied via legislation on 9 Oct 1862:
SEC. 4. The jurisdiction of each court shall extend to all officers now cognizable by courts martial under the rules and articles of war and the customs of war, and also to all offences defined as crimes by the laws of the Confederate States or of the several States, and when beyond the territory of the Confederate States, to all cases of murder, manslaughter, arson, rape, robbery and larceny, as defined by the common law, when committed by any private or officer in the army of the Confederate States, against any other private or officer in the army, or against the property or person of any citizen or other person not in the army."The war was far from over. Yet still no Confederate courts-martial for rape occurred.
An Act to organize military courts to attend the Army of the Confederate States in the field, and to define the powers of said courts.
"The men have behaved themselves the best I saw them either home or abroad. Every man has seemed to be on his good behavior since we entered Atlanta. The women have been dressed up waiting for our men to commence raping but they have waited in vain. There has not been a single outrage commited in this city, a circumstance that the people say they cannot say for the rebel army." - William Dunn, Surgeon, U.S. Army.
The soldiers "..blew out the parlor and passage lights, broke up the furniture, scattered the shrieking women like New York Zouaves before the bristling bayonets of North Carolina infantry, and to crown their unfortunate exploits, committed, it is alleged, an outrage upon the person of a "phrail phair one" named Eliza Liggon" - "The Richmond Examiner, June 13/18 1861, reporting on a visit of a detachment of McCulloch rangers of New Orleans, in the establishment of Clara Coleman at Richmond. Three men were held for rape
A statement of fact. As presented above, the Confederacy codified rape as an offense (previously prosecuted under civilian law as per the 1806 "Articles of War") in 1862. With that law in place there are still "0" courts-martial for the offense of rape perpetrated by a Confederate soldier.
Au contraire. Along with Article 33 above, this section of Article 32 applied as well:
Every officer commanding in quarters, garrisons, or on the march, shall keep good order, and, to the utmost of his power, redress all abuses or disorders which may be committed by any officer or soldier under his command.Again, the Confederates codified the offense so that military courts/tribunals would have jurisdiction. If a rape (or other offense) did occur the commanding officer was legally bound to arrange for judicial proceedings.
Actually the tyrant murdered mine's civilian farmer husband without legitimate reason and in cold blood. GGG grandpa's brother and the next door neighbor were also shot along side him.
I'm not sure if the tyrant ever made it to grandma's piano or if she even had one, but if she did it probably got burned with the rest of the farm after the murders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.