Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: atlaw
Hamdi was gathered up in Afghanistan with his fellow Al Qaeda pals. Padilla was picked up at Chicago's O'Hare airport after lying about the 10K in cash he came back from Pakistan with. When he left he had only his hands in his pockets, he lied about the amount of cash and he attended some "Al Qaeda" seminars while on holiday.

Whats significant about this is that AlQaeda declared war on the US in 1993 at the WTC. That fact has gone right over your head ever since.

177 posted on 08/19/2002 6:32:36 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
Your comment:"Hamdi was gathered up in Afghanistan with his fellow Al Qaeda pals. Padilla was picked up at Chicago's O'Hare airport after lying about the 10K in cash he came back from Pakistan with. When he left he had only his hands in his pockets, he lied about the amount of cash and he attended some "Al Qaeda" seminars while on holiday. Whats significant about this is that AlQaeda declared war on the US in 1993 at the WTC. That fact has gone right over your head ever since."

My comment: "Battlefield conditions? Am I missing something?"

Your comment: "Clearly."

Fine, Padilla was detained in Chicago. Chicago is not generally known as a battlefield, even in this war. But if it is to be now represented as such, it certainly extends the definition in a way that I am not comfortable with. Battlefield, by this definition, seems to be a euphemism for "wherever the heck we find you," including the town you and I are living in.

Furthermore, you argue the evidence, and if the evidence is that strong, why isn't the government arguing the evidence? There is a dramatic disconnect here. On the one hand, the evidence is so bloody obvious that Padilla ought to be put out to pasture without further consideration. On the the other hand, the government is arguing that there is no need to present evidence of any kind, because ... well, because we're the executive branch and the rest of the pesky branches can go to hell. If the SOB is that obviously guilty, try him and execute him. It's not that hard. Please explain to me why we need to set a remarkably dangerous precedent to deal with this guy.

195 posted on 08/19/2002 7:33:22 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson