[ProudAmerican2]

Forward and backwards. I've already given you your evidence, but none are so blind as those who refuse to see.

I saw your evidence. I read a lot of "if" and "probably" in the testimony. Not very convincing given the question has changed from "Should UN weapons inspectors have access" to "should the United States invade Iraq"? No one was asking Ritter that question in 1998.

[rdb3]

I saw your evidence. I read a lot of "if" and "probably" in the testimony. Not very convincing given the question has changed from "Should UN weapons inspectors have access" to "should the United States invade Iraq"? No one was asking Ritter that question in 1998.

Read it, rephrased the question, still say that you rely upon the words of this man that have mysteriously changed, and now you're walking between the raindrops.

Poof! Be gone.

[KainIV]

Scott Ritter made a documentary about Iraq after resigning as an inspector. Guess who financed $400,000.00 of it? Yep, an Iraqi who wanted Ritters help in removing sanctions on Iraq. Guess that explains the about face in his postion on Iraq. Ritter is a traitor. End of discussion.

here is a link to the truth:

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/iraq1/000731.htm