I saw your evidence. I read a lot of "if" and "probably" in the testimony. Not very convincing given the question has changed from "Should UN weapons inspectors have access" to "should the United States invade Iraq"? No one was asking Ritter that question in 1998.
Read it, rephrased the question, still say that you rely upon the words of this man that have mysteriously changed, and now you're walking between the raindrops.