[Burkeman1]

Yes- this meeting was denied after it first came out- and then re-affirmed. Interesitng. Atta meets with an Iraqi official and they are discussing 9/11? How do we know the Iraqi official is not a traitor to Sadaam and an Islamo fascist like Atta? Surely there are many opponents to Sadaam in his government - but perhpas not the type we like.

To point to this one meeting (if it ever happened) as proof of Iraqi involvement in 9/11 given all the evidence against our own allies is obscene.

[jwalsh07]

To point to this one meeting (if it ever happened) as proof of Iraqi involvement in 9/11 given all the evidence against our own allies is obscene.

You obviously didn't read it. The meeting was never "denied". The Czechs have maintained from the gitgo that Atta met al Ani in Prague in April of 2001 and all the wishing in the world isn't going to change that fact. al Ani was expelled shortly afterward.

Whats obscene to me is your willingness to simply avoid truth because it conflicts with your opinion of what Bush should do.

Why did Atta fly to Prague, risking discovery of the most horrendous terroist act ever, to meet with al Ani and then return the next day? Give me a rational explanantion for that and you will have done what nobody else has been able to.