Yes it does. In England in 1978 we see 100 autistic kids, in 1986 two years before the vaccine we see 250, and there's a relatively steady steady climb through that whole period. Even if you back up two years because it's graphing by birthdate instead of diagnosis date you still see a 100% increase in autistic kids BEFORE MMR. Same kind of thing going on in the California graph. The rate is CLEARLY increasing in both sample sets before MMR.
What the hell are you talking about? The number of new cases is the axis on the right and the UK line is for NW London ONLY! Go read the Lancet article where the graph was originally printed before you start spouting non-factual nonsense.
You might also be interested to know that in California, DSM-IV criteria for autism yields an estimated incidence of autism of 105-263 cases in 1998, when in actuality there were 1,685 new cases reported.
Nah, on 2nd thought you're probably not interested.