Replies

the Earth was running out all its natural resources.
This is Mathusian (dating from the 1700s). It was incorrect then, it was incorrect with the Club of Rome et al.(ca. 1965). It remains incorrect today. The religious have always been right ("God will provide") and the anti-religious can hardly stand it. So their propanda campaigns grow more frantic (fear) and louder (frustration) and their animosity towards the religious increases to the point where good is labeled bad (moral paradigm shifting, Orwellian pigs).

Agenda 21...is a plan for global governance.
...The [Johannesburg] Summit is the essential instrument for those who would impose a global, one world, government on the United States and all other nations.

This is megalomaniacal Identifying all the world's problems as stemming from not having a single entity responsible for governing the world, and then wanting to be the one who rules -- this is quintessential megalomania.

The answer, they said, was a massive restructuring of capitalism to "save" the Earth. Restructuring isn't the right word. Elimination is the right word.

Mr. Caruba is referring to captalism here directly; but indirectly the ultimate elimation is people. This is misanthropic. Fear over having too many people, or of the wrong type of people, is clearly seated at the center of the hatred of humanity.
Pagan cultures killed babies and virgins and other innocents, and often engaged in homosexual activity. So? So we see the rise of Neo-paganism being promoted. To see where this is intended to lead, you can use homosexuality as the pattern to expect. It was first tolerated, then accepted, and now promoted in the schools and in our institutions under penalty of being put out of business and or a position of authority. S.F. Judges Ordered to Cut Ties to Scouts

The agenda of these Mathusian misanthropic megalomaniacs could not be more clear.

But how many of us have been long considering how one or more of the items in this agenda isn't all that bad?
Are you one of those who has been seduced?

Do you think that the geometric progression defined by Thomas Malthus is, in the end, inevitable? That you must somehow help God provide?

Do you wish there were fewer people? That way you wouldn't have to correct them when they do wrong. And thus you'd have less fear of being charged with that most horrid of modern sins: being called judgmental.

And finally, if only everybody thought as you do, would that finally bring us world peace? A dictatorial world regime -- oh yes, benign to be sure, just like you -- has gotta have the answer, right?

How many of us have the courage to admit "I have an outright fondness for all these answers?"

I wonder.

Don't you?