[geaux]

No problem. I read an article when I was about 11 years old discussing both sides of the abortion issue (in Seventeen magazine, no less). I remember thinking pro-life was the only logical issue. No matter what angle I looked at it, the pro-choice side just didn't make any sense. The older I get, and the more I learn about what goes on in many abortion clinics, the more pro-life I become. Not just because it's the correct moral response, but because the abortion workers often lie or misrepresent information to the women, the women are not fully informed; they are not making a truly informed decision. Therefore, pro-choice does not really mean "pro-choice." If these people were really pro-choice, they would be advocating giving as much information as possible to women; instead, they do everything they can to hide details of the "procedure" as much as possible.

[syriacus]

If these people were really pro-choice, they would be advocating giving as much information as possible to women; instead, they do everything they can to hide details of the "procedure" as much as possible.

You're absolutely right.

Pro-aborts are no longer doing the killing in dark "back alleys," but they still want to hide what they are really doing. They don't like pictures of the abortion procedures to be shown. They aren't even able to present a case for their goal of "abortion on demand" without resorting to twisted logic.

They say there is a certain age (or stage of life) someone must reach in order to be a person, but they don't want to provide the details that define that constantly shifting age.

They sure do like to keep things murky.