Yes, we need a 'regime change' in this rogue state... (Euro Author: Europe should invade America)

Independent ^ | August 9th, 2002 | Adrian Hamilton

[JURB]

Putting aside the preponderance of drivel contained in this editorial, this guy's invasion strategy is severely flawed in one key aspect: he forgets the 2nd ammendment. Lock 'n load...

[Billthedrill]

Yep, Bush is a tyrant and Hitler a democratically-elected leader. No spin here.

[Tomalak]

Where was the "barf alert" warning? :)

---

---

[Grampa Dave]

We sound send a couple of Boy Scout and Girl Scout groups over and declare war on the drugged out and inner bred Euro Trash. In less than a week, the Euro Trash DNA Perverts would surrender.

$crew the Axis of Whining Europeans. We have all of their good people. The rest are the perverted dredges of society.

They could fight their own shadows.

Time we declared an economic war on all of them.

[Grampa Dave]

Should have been:

They could not fight their own shadows.

[JURB]

I did add the "Euro Author: Europe should invade America" rejoinder. Frankly, that is pretty much an implied barf alert, although I find this article more humorous than barf-worthy. Maybe I should have placed it under 'Humor'.

[KellyAdmirer]

If this guy worries so much about absolute majorities being the only legitimate form of government, he as a problem close to home. British Prime Ministers can be elected by a majority of PMs despite their party having received less than half the vote.

Hitler was democratically elected? What is this guy smoking?

As for keeping to our "own region," perhaps we should have done that in 1917 and 1944 as well? If we had, no doubt his screed would have had to have been translated from der Deutsche before we could read it.

[RightWhale]

If the EU intends going to invade and overthrow, they will get a heck of a battle from Mexico, whose own envelopment strategy is well underway.

[hchutch]

Europe? Take us on?

ROFLMAOSMMD!!!

Is this guy on a controlled substance?

[Ancesthntr]

this guy's invasion strategy is severely flawed in one key aspect: he forgets the 2nd ammendment. Lock 'n load...

Yes, the English historically seem to have blinders regarding firearms on this side of the pond. Let's see if Adrian Hamilton and his fellow girly-men can do as well as their forefathers did against ours. They'd probably do better in Assholeachusetts and the northeastern former colonies that have disarmed themselves, but those of us from the south would more than make up for it - we'd be smoking cigars in those cheesy London smoking clubs within weeks.

[Dog]

A Good One.......:-)

[prov1813man]

It would seem that these socialist sissies would like to forget their rescue at the hands of the "corrupt capitalists". Perhaps the next time they turn on one another we should leave them to it.

[Dog]

Lock n Load boys...

[JURB]

I did find this comment interesting:

To have "changed regime" in Berlin in the early Thirties would have meant overturning a democratically elected leader in Hitler.

He speaks like that is a bad thing. Of course, since he uses the familiar leftist whining refrain that Bush wasn't democratically elected, that totally justifies an invasion and overthrow of US government. Thus, invading Germany and taking out Hitler in the 1930's is a bad thing, invading America = good thing. Glad to see this guy has his priorities straight.

[45Auto]

Sure. The bastards only want us to intervene to save their a**es, like we did twice in the last century, but other than that, we should just leave them alone. No doubt this author has been the recipient of American tax dollars at some point in his worthless life since the US generously "gives" to every welfare state in the world and rarely asks anything in return. I guess it was O.K. to spend billions blowing up Serbia; something the worthless, cowardly, wine-sucking Eurotrash were incapable of doing on their own. Even the fifth-rate Argentines kicked a little British butt in the Falklands "war".

The jerk-offs represented by this author could never have survived if the US hadn't finally led to Hitler's demise.

The US is not now, nor has it ever been a "pure" democracy. Mob rule destroyed Greece and every other so-called democracy. I say sure, send over those Nato-UN blue helmets and find out what the 2nd Amendment means. The Brits can't even control the crime in London's streets.

[Thumper1960]

Bring it on, O Eurotrash!

To the victors go the spoils!

Europe would be the new eastern states of America.

[Billthedrill]

The problem remains the practicalities.

At no point need we take this sort of thing seriously - this kind of heavy-handed parody is regarded as "tongue-in-cheek" by a nearly monolithically humorless left. But as long as we're citing historical precedents, I can think of one other example where an outside force came into a country divided against itself in order to make things right: Vietnam.

As for tossing off the occupation of Washington D.C. as a light matter, I'd quote Rick in Casablanca: "There are parts of New York, Colonel, where I wouldn't advise the Wehrmacht to go."

[INSENSITIVE GUY]

Europe is a dungheap,do you think it would have any effect if terrorists took out the EIFFEL TOWER?

[45Auto]

I suppose you're right about this being a feeble attempt at lefty humor. Considering the awesome military might of the US, the author should be very glad that we are not a truly war-like nation, or else we would have used our power to do exactly as Mr. (or Ms) Hamilton suggests: impose our rule on the whole damn world. Personally I would be against that, not because I consider myself part of the "peace-loving nations", but because it would be very expensive to administer all that territory.

[JURB]

I know this thing is "tongue-and-cheek", but what makes it funny is that you just know deep-down-inside people like Adrian Peterson secretly wishes this could become reality, that the EU had the might and wherewithal to make this scenario come to fruition. It is what the wet dreams of the Euro-left--and their US sympathizers--are made of.