Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rdb3
R U "pro-choice?" R U in favor of the chickenhawks calling for the war on Iraq? R U in favor of "faith-based" government programs?

If no, then you are not a neo-con in the way i define the term.

William Kristol is the epitome of the term. 'Pod

80 posted on 08/12/2002 9:17:26 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod
If no, then you are not a neo-con in the way i define the term.

THAT'S THE PROBLEM! The definition keeps changing.

You just said, "in the way i define the term."

That doesn't cut it. I gave the proper definition for it (and it is true). Therefore I am a neocon and will always be one since I came from Left to Right. Any other definition is propaganda used to impugn. And I don't play that game.

Period.

When someone throws the first punch, that person can't complain if he or she gets beaten to within an inch of his or her life. In other words, don't start nuthin', won't be nuthin'.

85 posted on 08/12/2002 9:23:54 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson