Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides
If the GNP was exaggerated in 1999 and 2000, how can we be sure that it really dropped in the first three quarters of 2001?

Interesting thought. It probably didn't play out this way, but it would be an interesting strategy to sabotage the next administration (if the sitting president has already had 2 terms, what does he care?). Just inflate all the numbers for your last 2 years in office, and make yourself look real good (legacy!). Then, when the next president gets in office and tells the truth, he looks real bad by comparison (legacy!).

I always suspect the worst when it comes to Clinton, but I doubt that this scenario actually went through his head.

19 posted on 08/08/2002 11:25:47 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
I don't doubt it for a New York second.
28 posted on 08/08/2002 12:15:30 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson