Posted on 08/06/2002 9:02:04 AM PDT by SlickWillard
The bombs ended the war - that in itself is adequate justification.
Hiroshima Mayor Criticizes U.S. |
Story Filed: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 12:51 PM EDT
HIROSHIMA, Japan (AP) -- The mayor of Hiroshima criticized the United States for unilaterally pursuing its own interests and urged a worldwide ban on weapons of mass destruction, as thousands gathered Tuesday to mark the 57th anniversary of the world's first atomic bomb attack.
In the annual ceremony at Peace Memorial Park, Tadatoshi Akiba suggested that Washington's policies in the post-Sept. 11 world were misguided.
``The United States government has no right to force Pax Americana on the rest of us, or to unilaterally determine the fate of the world,'' Akiba said. He also urged President Bush to visit Hiroshima to see ``with his own eyes what nuclear weapons hold in store.''
At 8:15 a.m. -- the minute on Aug. 6, 1945, when the bomb exploded after being dropped from a U.S. B-29 warplane -- a bell tolled and more than 45,000 survivors, residents and dignitaries from around the world bowed their heads for 60 seconds of silence to remember the victims.
The bomb killed about 140,000 people and sickened hundreds of thousands more in Hiroshima, 430 miles southwest of Tokyo. Three days later, a U.S. bomber dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki, killing 70,000 people. Japan surrendered Aug. 15, 1945, ending World War II.
In his remarks, Akiba criticized what he called the prevailing international philosophy of '``I'll show you' and 'I'm stronger than you are,''' particularly in Afghanistan and the Middle East.
Akiba called on countries to scrap weapons of mass destruction, even as nuclear-armed India and Pakistan remained on war footing in the hotly contested region of Kashmir.
``The probability that nuclear weapons will be used again and the danger of nuclear war are increasing,'' Akiba said. ``Since the terrorist attack against the American people on Sept. 11 last year, the danger has become more striking.''
Been there, done that Mr. Akiba.
I know my grandfather was glad that he didn't need participate in the Japanese invasion.
I was also reading "Semper Fi, Mac" recently....(an oral history of the Marines in WWII, and an excellent read). If I remember correctly, the book mentioned that the 1st and 6th Marine divisions were going to spearhead Operation Olympic (the invasion of Japan). Both divisions were written out of the plan by H+36. In other words, the casualties would have been so high that the divisions would have ceased to exist 36 hours after they hit the beach. And that's only one branch of the service.....
Maybe there's a military historian out there that confirm or comment.
Oh, I get it. Civilians at Hiroshima are to blame because they were dumb enough to live there. Too bad, so sad. People consider this acceptable?
Is it acceptable when enemies of the United States kill civilians and dismiss those casualties as "besides the point"?
I think Rightwing2 is spot-on with this elegant, succinct belief: the killing of innocents is always morally wrong. Doesn't matter the place, the time, the circumstances. It's wrong and we should not be a party to such barbarism. When we embrace the madness, we become mad ourselves.
I'm glad you guys weren't in charge of WWII...we would have lost.
Zieg heil!
No. We have been known to drop a-bombs on them.
The WWII-era Japanese could have taught the Nazis a couple of things. And the Japanese of that era had the suicidal, fanatical mindset we see in Al Qaeda to go with it. That's not a combination to fool around with.
As ripe for surrender as you suggest they were, it took two bombs to get the message delivered - what's wrong with this picture?
No one will ever convince me it wasn't the right thing to do.
Oh, I get it. Civilians at Hiroshima are to blame because they were dumb enough to live there. Too bad, so sad. People consider this acceptable?
Read his comment in its context. Tibbets was addressing the recent spate of news stories concerning possible civilian deaths in Afghanistan [such as the "Wedding Party/Anti-Aircraft Battery" fraud].
There is a very old, very moral approach to this question: If men commit acts of barbarism, then run and hide behind the skirts of women and children, they should not be surprised to see similar acts of barbarism visited upon same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.