Yes they are beautiful and yes they do serve a purpose.
But a chief purpose of our forests has been disregarded by the environmentalist whackos.
It is a usable, renewable commodity and should be farmed (logged).
Millions of acres have been destroyed. Hundreds of homes have been burnt down. Men have lost their lives. Animals have lost their lives. The atmosphere has been polluted for "NO REASON" (ever hear global warning when these fires blow-of course not!) and we have lost the use of a valuable commodity..
If that's "balancing and preserving nature", you loony environmentalists better change your definitions.
You guys have hit a fire wall and what was predicted has occurred. You have harmed our people and our world with your power and that is a violation of the laws of mankind.
Sac
Yes, by our very own Carry_Okie who is at this very moment on a book tour explaining how the useful fools of the environmental movement are supporting the exact opposite of what they think.
His book: Natural Process