I'm not sure what the "other" case was that the cowards on the US SC decided wan't important enough to hear. If the case had been about whether animal owners should be called "owners" or "Pet guardians", I'm sure the court would have lined up to hear it.
So far, all I hear from the Bush crowd is platitudes and rhetoric. I fear that nothing postive in terms of repealing certain egregiously unconstitutional gun laws will be accomplished under this administration.
I concur 100%. Wouldn't want to rock the boat and risk undercutting over 20,000 gun laws built up over the last sixty years now, would we?
The other case was U.S. vs. (John Lee) Haney