1 posted on
08/04/2002 12:31:35 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks; Mitchell; Nogbad
The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee says there is "no doubt" Saddam Hussein would use "every weapon of mass destruction he has" against the United States if it attacks Iraq. The real reason we haven't retaliated against Saddam for 9-11 gets clearer every day.
THIS IS NEXT
WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX
YOU CAN NOT STOP US
ARE YOU AFRAID?
To: 11B3; abwehr; Alamo-Girl; angkor; aristeides; Betty Jo; Black Jade; bluefish; boston_liberty; ...
Mr. Rumsfeld also said Iraq now has mobile biological laboratories that would be very hard to bomb. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't heard this stated before, certainly not officially.
If they are revealing this now it must be for a reason.
4 posted on
08/04/2002 2:30:39 AM PDT by
Nogbad
To: kattracks
There should be more of an air war this time since he would have no need to "save" his assets for later.
I didn't say it would last long..... just more targets of oppurtunity. Do G suits restrict erections?
9 posted on
08/04/2002 3:42:05 AM PDT by
Feckless
To: kattracks
my reading of this and other articles indicates we'll need 18-24 mos. before the US military feels its ready for iraq....this includes the pols waffling-and then, tho we may be ready, we may not act OR it'll be too late in the sense of horrific iraq-rooted atrocities having already occurred.
10 posted on
08/04/2002 5:24:16 AM PDT by
1234
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson