Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Directed energy: a new kind of weapon
OpenDemocracy ^ | July 31, 2002 | Paul Rogers

Posted on 08/03/2002 6:02:52 PM PDT by gcruse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: gcruse

21 posted on 08/03/2002 6:35:07 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
22 posted on 08/03/2002 6:36:04 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Read Tom Clancy's "The Cardinal of the Kremlin".

One Soviet directed energy weapon used a nuclear explosion to create a particle beam. the nuclear bomb would explode in a metal lined chamber. When the metal shell vaporized it would form an instantaneous electrical differential within a circuit which would produce an electrical current which would then produce the proton particvle beam. Kinda like "chained lightning".

23 posted on 08/03/2002 6:44:30 PM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fzob
I think we are more farther along than just "remotely:"

Laser Team Fires Up The Raygun


the only way to repeatedly hit a "bullet" will be with a laser beam

Los Angeles - Apr 30, 2002
The Air Force's Airborne Laser (ABL) team successfully completed test-firings of the first flight laser module (LM-1) in March. The firings produced record power levels of 118 percent of the laser's designed power output and exceeded the power requirements of the ABL mission. The ABL system will use six such laser modules to create a megawatt-class chemical laser flying in a specially built Boeing 747-400F to shoot down missiles in the boost phase.

The high-power laser is coupled with a revolutionary optical system capable of focusing a basketball-sized spot of heat that can burn through a missile skin from hundreds of miles away. The laser and optical systems are controlled by a sophisticated computer system that can simultaneously track and prioritize potential targets.

²We are extremely happy with TRW's work on the laser and with the potential this holds for the nation's missile defense program," said Col. Ellen Pawlikowski, director of the Airborne Laser System Program Office at Kirtland AFB, N.M.

The series of laser performance tests, culminating more than a year of integration and testing by TRW, was completed in January at the company's Capistrano Test Site in southern California. TRW is disassembling LM-1 in preparation for delivery to Edwards Air Force Base for integration into ABL's flight system. The company has also begun delivery of the components required for the integration of the remaining five modules needed for the first ABL-equipped 747.

"I'm very proud of the technical innovation and collaboration within our team that helped us complete this test program," said Steve Hixson, TRW's ABL program manager.

"Not only did the laser exceed performance goals, but our team overcame significant engineering challenges, including demonstration of a new two-stage turbo pump capable of the chemical flow rates required for full-power lasing. The successful tests of LM-1 mark a major step forward in overcoming the technical risk in developing the world's first airborne directed energy weapon system."

Development of the ABL demonstrator now shifts to the ABL System Integration Laboratory, a new facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. There the ABL team will assemble the five additional laser modules, integrate them with LM-1, then perform a ground-based demonstration of the integrated high-energy laser that will fly on the first ABL system.

The LM-1 test program was conducted as part of Team ABL's Program Development and Risk Reduction contract with the Air Force Space & Missile Systems Center.

The Airborne Laser program is managed by the Air Force ABL system program office, Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., which reports to Aeronautical Systems Center, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. The Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has management authority and funding responsibility for the ABL program.

Boeing is leading the team selected by the U.S. Air Force to develop and demonstrate the ABL. Team ABL includes Boeing, Lockheed Martin and TRW, working closely with the Air Force and MDA. Boeing is responsible for developing the ABL surveillance BMC4I, integrating the weapon system and supplying the modified 747-400 Freighter aircraft.

TRW is providing the complete chemical oxygen-iodine laser system. Lockheed Martin is developing the beam control/fire control system, which will acquire the target, then accurately point and fire the laser.

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/laser-02b.html

24 posted on 08/03/2002 6:44:49 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The United States has a pronounced lead over all other countries, but its potential success may encourage others to follow suit, setting up a new kind of arms race; it may also lead to opponents developing new ways of retaliating. In the light of the attacks of 11 September, this is not to be discounted.

What a stinking load of unprocessed sewage. The 9/11 attacks didn't take place because we had developed weapons that worked too well. So now because of the 9/11 attacks, we're supposed to hamstring ourselves, for fear that if we gain an unfair advantage, it will make somebody mad enough to hurt us?

25 posted on 08/03/2002 6:47:20 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Manilow? My god man, that's a war crime!

I bad...must have gotten out of touch with my "FEELINGS"!

BWAHAHAHAHA!!

FMCDH

26 posted on 08/03/2002 6:47:27 PM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
Kinda like "chained lightning".

Now you're groovin'!..."Chain lightening, it feels soooo good"

FMCDH

27 posted on 08/03/2002 6:50:12 PM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
I have read of similar things. The problem seems to be keeping the damned thing aimed during a nuclear explosion.
28 posted on 08/03/2002 6:51:02 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: spetznaz
((((((((((((((((((((PING)))))))))))))))))))))
30 posted on 08/03/2002 6:54:20 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The problem seems to be keeping the damned thing aimed during a nuclear explosion.

We need a recoiless rifle technology for nukes!

31 posted on 08/03/2002 6:56:13 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"Here, hold muh cigar,,,"
32 posted on 08/03/2002 7:03:59 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The nuclear explosion is underground. The metal sphere is part of an electrical circuit. When it is vaporized a massive electromotive force is created. Ohms law is E=IR. or E/R=I. In theory and practice when R - resistance goes to zero or a very tiny number as the denominator E goes maximum as does I or current. When you have a short in a circuit current rises and the nichrome in your toaster glows and cooks the bread or Pop-Tart. House fires are caused when similar occurrences are not defeated by your fuse box.

Directed weapons using nuclear bombs are just many thousands of orders of magnitude but produce the same energy. Directing it is the "easy" task.

The iodine laser in the Boeing ABL will use similar techniques. Instead of a grain sized laser which is used in you laser printer, the B-747 will carry big chemical lasers!

33 posted on 08/03/2002 7:04:46 PM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
LOL!
34 posted on 08/03/2002 7:04:59 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
The application I read about, IIRC, was a satellite x-ray laser using a nuclear blast. Keeping it on target during the detonation was iffy.
35 posted on 08/03/2002 7:10:30 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Ha! That question deserves a second viewing of "Real Genius"...

Sure, what could it hurt to send Mike Tyson out in his underwear and gloves against some of these morons?

Shoot him up full of speed and the old adage of "One Ranger, One Fight" might be dispelled. What a sight to behold!

Now back to the homeland problem I wandered into...

Damn straight for the fisticuffs, but locally here at home, since we have plenty to worry about from the idiots who are now self-serving in congress (again, small "C" for a reason) rather than being responsive for the benefit of the Country as a whole.

These people, on both sides of the aisle, are so damned enamored with themselves that you and I have no determining effect anymore.

But when one of these "hard-ons of Hubris" get literally kicked in the ass and the cameras are there, they will have to answer the question the kikker and associates may pose.

Sh*theads like Trent (cheerleader nancy-boy) Lott needs to feel the contact of sports he/she/it ran up and down the sidelines rah-rahing, since he hasn't a clue anymore, if he ever did. Just throwing perverts like Condit out isn't good enough anymore.

What are these asses afraid of? Gut feelings would tell you that there is more to it than just "not being elected for another term", especially for the holier-than-thou political lifers in D.C.

I continue to demand that GW close the border doorways and clean house, and the same cleansing goes for the Legislative wobbling bitching and moaning bunch.

The Executive Branch looks sound, the Judicial a bit lax, but more members of the legislative arm of this country are looking dirtier and dirtier by the hour.

The folks of the country will weather a complete douche of the Legislative Branch, but as it sits right now, the congress is appearing more and more like the packed colon of Elvis Presley, and the stench is reaching far more than the Beltway toads know.
36 posted on 08/03/2002 7:11:25 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I think we are more farther along than just "remotely:"

I know we are alot farther along than just "remotely:" we had lasers weapons developed more then a dozen years ago.
37 posted on 08/03/2002 7:29:51 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Tesla thought of this at the turn of the century........
38 posted on 08/03/2002 7:31:19 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crazymonarch
In addition to EMP he postulated on the use of Particle Beams as weapons, he was right, but for the wrong reasons. An EMP weapon would not have been to effective against 1940 technology as there was little electronics used then.

As an aside, he also built remote controlled submarines which were offered to the Navy, which they of course refused. The man was WAY ahead of his contemporaries and in some areas and respects, ahead of where we are today. On the other hand, he was quite eccentric to say the least.

---max

39 posted on 08/03/2002 7:35:32 PM PDT by max61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Confederate Keyester
Some of his research he kept to himself after proclaiming it to be to terrible to ever use.

That's why the Feds confiscated his research notes upon his death.

---max

40 posted on 08/03/2002 7:37:13 PM PDT by max61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson