Size did matter to Marie-Antoinette

The Observer (U.K.) | 08/04/2002 | Paul Webster

[ValerieUSA]

I'm sure his Viagra bill is nothing compared to the doctor bills you get to pay to David Yanisch, a forensic services manager at the Special Commitment Center, and state psychiatrist Mark McClung.

[Washington-Husky]

The socialism around here is palpable. I'm surprised we don't have a state income tax yet.

[martin_fierro]

I initially wondered who would post such a picture, but seeing it was you all became clear. <|:)~

[2Trievers]

And I have MORE ... were you asking? LOL &;-)

[2Trievers]

After two 'vulins ... I have NO shame! &;-)

[2Trievers]

May I be the FIRST? ... he he &;-) HAPPY BIRTHDAY!

[StoneColdGOP]

Yeah I do. But I ain't sayin' nothin'!

[LadyDoc]

They don't know history. Louis suffered from phimosis, a tight foreskin, that made it painful to get an erection, so he didn't consummate the marriage for years.

Finally he got the guts to get it fixed (either circumcision or a dorsal slit) and they finally did it.The story is well known in the medical community. (guess this "historian" didn't bother to read the medical literature).

Marie was accused of playing around sexually, but there is little evidence that she actually did so. Much of the court gossip has been known for years, and nonsense that M.A. was too "tight" is doubtful, especially since she had two kids...even a five pound baby is bigger than most men's masculine endowment.

[LadyDoc]

LINK