[discostu]

No Dom that's not it at all. I've watched you too long. You forget there were months there when I avoided posting to threads you were on, doesn't mean I didn't read them. Here's the Dominic Harr school of "debate":
Post some assertion which may or may not be backed up by fact and query for input.
When recieving input that contradicts the assertion call it into question.
When recieving incontrovertible facts backing of that contradictory input question the experience of the poster.
When said poster lists their experience scoff at it, either by insisting that no one with said experience would say such a thing, or by insisting that said experience has no real world value compared to the immense wealth of Dominic Harr's all knowing knowledge.
At this point the thread is now nothing more than a pissing contest because YOU have turned it personal. Nobody's willing to back down on the issue now, least of all you even in the face of tons of evidence from NAI and you will label everyone a "partisan" or "apologist" simply because they think you're an incredibly rude and annoying person.

[Dominic Harr]

Like it or not, in a highly technical thread someone questioning your technical experience is not a personal attack.

Any more than if you gave a medical opinion questioning your medical experience would be a personal attack.

Do not flame anyone else for questioning your technical expertise. Others have, and will again. And sooner or later you're going to send a filth-laden email to someone who wants you suspended.

I'm just trying to help keep that from happening.