Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
People rent to maximize either their lifestyle or their convenience.

Or to avoid losing their shirt in a housing bubble.

But people can't afford to buy these homes in my area, some say! That's no reason to refrain from buying. What?! One can purchase and live in an RV, mobile home, or house boat from a low-cost-of-living area, and then one can move that home into the high-cost area, for instance.

Would you pay 100K$ + for a run down mobile home? How about 150K$ for a 500 sq. ft. 1 BR condo that hasn't had maintainence done for 10 years? A well maintained condo 2Br, 900 SQ. FT. goes for 250K$.Most yuppies go for the styrofoam 400K$ McMansions...at least back when they had jobs, they did. Most of the cheap stuff for 40 miles in all directions has been snapped up by speculators.Many of the speculators are amatuers who have removed most of the equity from their primary residences to speculate in real estate.It just goes up, they tell me. Naturally these people vote for folks who pledge to prevent further development.

I simply can't find value for my dollar and so I refuse to bid...I've managed to save 50% of my income despite renting...

The homeownership rate in Cali, metro Colorado is the lowest in the nation. 50% ownership rates aren't uncommon.

They get no income-tax deduction from renting, and they build no equity while renting.

Yet another false incentive for ownership. In the long run this distorts the value of homes. Let's say we provided tax breaks for Picasso owners, would you expect Picassos to become more or less expensive? One of the primary reasons we can't have serious tax reform in this country, is the damage it would do to the housing markets.

43 posted on 08/04/2002 4:35:49 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: AdamSelene235
"Would you pay 100K$ + for a run down mobile home?"

No. If I didn't like the state of the local housing market I'd take advantage of the mobile part of "mobile home" and buy a used one for $2,500.00 in Alabama, or I'd buy an RV or a house boat (new house boats sell for under $100k, btw). Then I'd move it to the real-estate bubble-zone where I had to live (one presumes, for a job).

You can talk all day long. You can convince yourself that you are making the smart-money play by renting, but in the end you are only harming your own finances.

Your rent is probably your largest single monthly expense, and yet that money is being entirely consumed. Rent money builds no equity. Spending money on rent is the same as burning your cash every month because it is just as gone either way. You don't get your rent money back.

That's a heck of a thing to say about your largest monthly cash expenditure, that you don't get it back.


You are probably wrong about the housing bubble. Real-estate prices aren't determined by how much people make, are taxed, or how far prices have increased in the past.

Real-estate prices are determined by supply and demand. If more people are moving to your area, then housing prices go up. If everyone moves out of your area, then housing prices will plummet.

If you aren't sure what people are doing and don't know how to figure out current and future demographic trends, you can always buy and live in a more mobile form of domicile rather than "risking" your money in the normal housing market.

But people don't rent to escape a housing bubble. People rent to maximize their convenience or lifestyle. Sometimes they don't want to commute. Sometimes they want a certain "prestige" of a neighborhood. Sometimes they just want to be lazy. Other times renters just don't want to part with the down payment needed to buy a house.

In some areas such as in San Francisco, not only do people rent, but they share their rental units with multiple other people, all in order to be in a trendy neighborhood close to all of the "Action". Renters in those types of areas don't even think of themselves as potential buyers. They have an image of themselves based on entirely different things (e.g. who they know, how they dress, where they work, club persona, et al). Heck, 20 or 30 years ago they might have even treid to kid each other that the reason they rented instead of owned was because of a "bubble", but housing prices have increased so steadily for so many decades that such thin rationalizations have been tossed aside from those areas.

Renting might be fun or convenient, but it's no way to succeed financially.

44 posted on 08/04/2002 9:06:19 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson