To: EaglesUpForever
I don't think specifically drugs, rape, euthinasia, concrete and many other things were directly mentioned.
Therefore all structures with concrete must be taken down since they must be against the Constitution by your way of thinking.
16 posted on
08/02/2002 2:07:02 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
To: A CA Guy
Therefore all structures with concrete must be taken down since they must be against the Constitution by your way of thinking. You've got it backwards. Concrete is not ILLEGAL in the Constitution, therefore it should fall under "liberty and the pursuit of happiness", just like possessing plants that were put here by God, whether they be flowers or marijuana.
29 posted on
08/02/2002 2:20:52 PM PDT by
SunStar
To: A CA Guy
Growing or using marijuana is quite different from Rape... A fundamental ideal of the Constitution and one of the principles that our Founding Fathers fought for is that of liberty and personal freedom. Rape contradicts such liberty, as it is a crime with a victim; the violation of that victim's liberty should obviously be outlawed.
However, in the case of criminalizing the growth of a particular species of plant, that sort of "law" is as anti-American as they get, as someone pointed out it would have landed many of our Funding Fathers in jail, though obviously they would never have abandoned their principles long enough to adopt it.
The dumbed down population of today loves to wave flags but they often have no idea what they stand for.
To: A CA Guy
I don't think specifically drugs, rape, euthinasia, concrete and many other things were directly mentioned. Therefore all structures with concrete must be taken down since they must be against the Constitution by your way of thinking.
Have you ever heard of the 9th and 10th Amendments, ignoramus?
-ccm
111 posted on
08/03/2002 4:11:52 AM PDT by
ccmay
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson