Posted on 08/01/2002 10:57:58 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:04:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The antigun set went bonkers in Michigan a year ago when the courts stymied their efforts to gut a new law expanding gun rights. The Michigan Supreme Court threw out the gun-control advocates' ballot initiative, saying the issue couldn't be challenged with a referendum. Having failed there, the antigunners took aim with the only weapon left in their arsenal: inflated rhetoric. Relaxing gun restrictions, they warned, would bring Wild West-style shootouts, blood in the streets and a severe political backlash against Republicans and conservative judges.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
That would be just fine, as long as you don't think it's in any way a substitute for the Second Amendment. As the courts have recently reminded you, the Second Amendment is about the individual right to keep and bear arms, not deer hunting.
Contrary to what you learned from the pap put out by Hollyweird, the Old West was not nearly as violent as depicted in the movies, and nowhere even on the same scale as the 'hoods of Detroit.
There were social predators back then, just as there have always been and as there are now. However, since nearly everybody had a gun, the social predators didn't have such an easy job, and their life expectancy was fairly short.
As we have seen by the decrease in violent crime in nearly every state where they've implemented CCW laws, "an armed society is a polite society".
Yeah, only Hollywood would consider it's own movies "history".
I'd like to see all of the anti-gunners in Michigan put signs in their windows that say: "Gun-free home" in their residences.
If the governor forgets, we'll just have to think of a subtle reminder.
Sec. 6. Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
The anti-gunners have been trying the "Dodge City" rhetoric since Florida first instituted 'Shall Issue'. Hasn't happened, yet they keep saying it. It says something about their intelligence, or lack thereof, that they still haven't come up with a better argument.
That would be great! Maybe I'll make some up and sell them as a 'Democratic fundraiser.'
We could use 'em in Illinois too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.