Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freed prisoner wants compensation: 18 years for a crime he didn't do
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^ | 8.1.02 | Tim Bryant

Posted on 08/01/2002 7:58:35 AM PDT by rface

Edited on 05/11/2004 5:33:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

On his first full day of freedom in 18 years, Larry Johnson said he wanted money from the state for imprisoning him for a rape that new DNA evidence shows he did not commit.

Johnson, 48, said he could not depend indefinitely on the help of relatives, who welcomed him upon his release from prison Tuesday after a judge ruled he had been wrongfully imprisoned.


(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dnatest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: rface
Oh wait never mind he did it before thats diffrent.
61 posted on 08/01/2002 10:42:26 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
He should get a lot of money and everything the woman who claimed rape owns.

And what does the woman that he DID rape get???

62 posted on 08/01/2002 11:02:02 AM PDT by rogercolleridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rogercolleridge
See #61.
63 posted on 08/01/2002 11:05:14 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Couldn't tell if you were serious or not.
64 posted on 08/01/2002 11:12:20 AM PDT by rogercolleridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: rogercolleridge
Didn't read about the previous conviction I just really really hate women who cry rape sexual harassment etc.
65 posted on 08/01/2002 11:21:17 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I'm torn about this. Yes, what happened to him was an awful injustice, but I can't see compensating him unless there was real wrongdoing on the part of someone in the system - the police, the prosecutor, the judge, or maybe the jury. If everyone did their job the way they were supposed to, and nobody made any egregiously stupid mistakes or intentionally framed him, I have to file this one under the heading of "tough luck". I know that sounds sh*tty, but where do you draw the line? Sometimes bad things happen and it's nobody's fault - that's life.

If you injure or damage someone else, or their property, you are morally and legally liable to fully and completely compensate them for that damage. Whether you may have acted intentionally, maliciously, recklessly, egregiously, unreasonably, incompentently, without due diligence, imprudently or negligently makes no difference. Negligence/recklessness entitles the victim to punitive damages, and willfulness/maliciousness makes you subject to criminal sanction. But you are obligated to compensate those whom you damage, no matter your excuses.

66 posted on 08/01/2002 12:23:57 PM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Give me a number...
67 posted on 08/01/2002 12:53:06 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Give me a number...

How about a formula?

Lost income (based on reasonable assumptions regarding the person's economic prospects) + compensation for pain, suffering and psychoemotional trauma caused by imprisonment (based on precedents in similar cases) + compensation for loss of liberty and enjoyment of life (based on precedents in other cases, and including loss of opportunity to start a family) + compensation for damaging the person's reputation (based on precedents in other cases) - living expenses while imprisoned (based on what they would reasonably have been, had the person had to live on his own "on the outside").

Plugging real numbers into this formula would require information I don't have and can't easily get.

68 posted on 08/01/2002 1:24:29 PM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Didn't read about the previous conviction I just really really hate women who cry rape sexual harassment etc.

I hear ya. :)

69 posted on 08/02/2002 6:34:08 AM PDT by rogercolleridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: mgd3255
Whatever.
71 posted on 08/02/2002 7:06:52 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Who exactly damaged him here? Who is liable for compensating him?
72 posted on 08/02/2002 7:08:24 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; general_re
Considering Johnson's past prison stay and lack of work history and sorry reputation. What do you get when you multiply eighteen times zero. Full compensation.
73 posted on 08/02/2002 7:20:45 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
"Well, Mr. Johnson, we find that the state is liable for your wrongful incarceration. We also find that you're a worthless POS, and set damages at $0."

Something like that? ;)

74 posted on 08/02/2002 7:28:45 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Pretty much.
75 posted on 08/02/2002 7:31:23 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Who exactly damaged him here?

Formally, the People of the State of Missouri.

76 posted on 08/02/2002 8:31:19 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
What action (or inaction) of theirs caused him harm?
77 posted on 08/02/2002 8:33:39 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I like that!! Seriously though....we are all responsible for where we find ourselves each day....at least in part....I don't know what made the cops look at this guy in the first place but you can bet his prior conviction made them look even closer. Even if he was "rehabilitated" and a fine citizen...that prior act will follow him all his days....it is something he have hangig around his neck forever. Whose fault is that?....HIS....he paid his debt to society yes.....but actual life is different....momma always told me to consider the consequense of my actions because they might follow me forever......
78 posted on 08/02/2002 8:47:33 AM PDT by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Who exactly damaged him here? Who is liable for compensating him?

The government that imprisoned him. The court that convicted and sentenced him. The victim who falsely accused him.

79 posted on 08/02/2002 11:40:29 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Considering Johnson's past prison stay and lack of work history and sorry reputation. What do you get when you multiply eighteen times zero. Full compensation.

At most, the points you raise might mean that the net of adding up his lost income and then subtracting his living expenses would be negligible. However, some of the other matters in my formula would still be worth a significant sum. The loss of liberty and psycho-emotional trauma are probably no small sum. How much would you want to be paid before you would voluntarily agree to experience the same thing? That's what it's worth.

80 posted on 08/02/2002 11:46:42 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson