[Torie]

So the question before the house is can Torricelli get away with not releasing the letter of the federal prosecutors without the mainstream media continuing to pound him, and without going into free fall in the polls?

[Darlin']

What he didn't say was, I did it.

[martin_fierro]

What he didn't say, he hasn't been saying for quite a while.

www.torricelliduck.com

[webber]

• (without the mainstream media continuing to pound him, and without going into free fall in the polls?)

The mainstream media has already forgotten this episode. They're already gearing up for another slam against President Bush, Attorney General John Ashcroft, or any Conservative Republican - like Sen. McCain -

N O T ! ! !

[Torie]

Your favorite newspaper is of the opinion that The Torch may we found a bit wanting.

[The Electrician]

Essentially, Mr. Torricelli delivered a mea culpa without the mea

That's the essence of Clintonism, isn't it? The Demo/Commies have perfected that one, haven't they?

[ladyinred]

And what the NYT's didn't say is that he couldn't be tried and convicted in the Senate because if he were expelled, the RATS would lose control of the Senate.
Therefore, he skates.

[Uff Da]

That letter, given to the Senate after prosecutors decided not to seek an indictment of the senator, is under seal in federal court. Several news organizations, including The New York Times, are seeking its release. The senator argues that releasing it would violate his privacy.

Funny there's no 'leak' when it comes to a corrupt Democrat!! If he had been a Republican, this letter would wind up 'seeing the light of day'!

[eureka!]

This letter should come out. "Privacy" problems? Redact it a la a FOIA response. That will only raise more questions and keep the story alive. Hehehehe....

[Coleus]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/750856/posts

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/9/17/162056.shtml