Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cool Libertarians
reasononline ^ | July 30, 2002 | By Jeremy Lott

Posted on 07/30/2002 6:46:04 PM PDT by RANDomScout

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-249 next last
To: mindprism.com
The libertarians are right on this one, personal condemnation of immorality is the way to uphold human dignity -- not through guns and censorship.

Yeah when will they start?

121 posted on 07/30/2002 11:36:02 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
> Tex --Without knowing what you said, you said it.

Thanks, But I am surprised you agreed. Grow the hell up!

Perfect !

122 posted on 07/30/2002 11:37:53 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
See? We agree on everything. LOL
123 posted on 07/30/2002 11:41:11 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Ahh does Tpaine want an assault wifle? LMAO.


You find the strangest damn things to laugh your ass off about.

--- Do you have any concept of how big a constitutional idiot you appear to be? - ANY? - I doubt it.
-- I gonna laugh myself to sleep on that note.
124 posted on 07/30/2002 11:43:23 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
"The same with various sexual practices considered abnormal - I don't hear anyone demanding laws against that."

There are laws against that.

125 posted on 07/30/2002 11:43:39 PM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Do you have any concept of how big a constitutional idiot you appear to be? - ANY? - I doubt it. -- I gonna laugh myself to sleep on that note.

Good night little one.

126 posted on 07/30/2002 11:46:35 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
See? We agree on everything. LOL

No, we don't. I don't think the US is populated by 12 yr olds needing your guidance (at the point of a gun).

BTW you seem to be very fond of LOL at 1:30 in the am; have you be looked after by a government approved psychologist ?

127 posted on 07/30/2002 11:53:01 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
No, we don't. I don't think the US is populated by 12 yr olds needing your guidance (at the point of a gun).

No just libertarians. I use LOL a lot when dealing with 12 year olds. They are a funny bunch.

128 posted on 07/30/2002 11:56:39 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Ahh does texiefornever want tpaine to be a wittle one? LM210lbAO.
129 posted on 07/30/2002 11:57:28 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Ahh does texiefornever want tpaine to be a wittle one? LM210lbAO.

Now there ya go making puddles all over the floor.

130 posted on 07/30/2002 11:59:06 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
When you lack wit, you LOL.
131 posted on 07/31/2002 12:00:56 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
When you lack wit, you LOL, a LOT.

And make doggie poo 'jokes'.
132 posted on 07/31/2002 12:02:36 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
And make doggie poo 'jokes'.

'effing mind reader ...
"Miss Cleo Texasforever, what is my credit-card number ?"

133 posted on 07/31/2002 12:10:01 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever; Chunga
The libertarians are right on this one, personal condemnation of immorality is the way to uphold human dignity -- not through guns and censorship.

Yeah when will they start?

I do so privately every day. I suspect the reluctance of libertarians to do so publicly is due to the fear that this will incite further laws.

Chunga (on sodomy,etc):There are laws against that.

And where is the conservative insistance they be enforced?

The righteous do not fear condemnation for doing what is right -- so where are all the 'righteous' when it comes to removing children from parents who are immoral in their homosexuality or their promiscuity -- or even their drug use?

These things are impractical on the government level, they can only be accomplished by a philosophical shift in societies values -- only when we 'learn'. Even then the pendulum will always oscillate.

You cannot stop the wheel of life, the ying and yang, you will burn your hands to touch it.

'Liberalism' arouses 'Fascism' arouses 'Liberalism'....

You want to dam it up - but whoa to all when the dam breaks. Instead concentrate on physical coexistence and release mechanisms that will delaminate and disintegrate the philosophical tides that buffet us all.

134 posted on 07/31/2002 12:16:25 AM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
I suspect the reluctance of libertarians to do so publicly is due to the fear that this will incite further laws

OH bull hockey.

135 posted on 07/31/2002 12:17:55 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
knock off the personal attacks.
136 posted on 07/31/2002 12:33:26 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Your the 1st one whining on this thread.
137 posted on 07/31/2002 12:37:37 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
The majority of libertarians on this forum and elsewhere are moral liberals.

Moral liberals seek to encourage immoral and unwise behaviors and protect individuals from the natural consequences of their own immoral behavior. Conservatives often fail to oppose such protections, but instead seek to enforce artificial consequences for certain types of immoral behavior. What libertarians want is for people who engage in immoral or unwise behaviors to suffer the natural consequences of their own actions.

A kid who is told not to touch the hot stove, and is punished every time his mother sees him try it is unlikely to learn not to touch the hot stove. Instead he'll learn not to touch the hot stove when Mother is around. What will teach the kid not to touch the hot stove, period, is trying to do so. It's not Mother that makes the kid's hand hurt when he touches the stove. Rather, the pain is a direct and natural consequence of the action.

Conservatives and libertarians both believe that people should act morally. The disagreement is generally focused on how to attain that end.

138 posted on 07/31/2002 12:40:55 AM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Would it be inappropriate to observe that it's going to tie his hands considerably?
139 posted on 07/31/2002 12:40:57 AM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: supercat
You've obviously NEVER raised a child ! LOL
140 posted on 07/31/2002 12:43:45 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson