Replies

I don't know if there are current numbers, although I know she is taking polls, She is a Clinton afterall. She is testing the waters that is obvious.

I'm sure she's testing the waters, but it doesn't look like she's in a particular hurry to jump in. Maybe her poll numbers are telling her what I'm telling you?

Brit Hume's hour on Fox News last night (July 30) had a roundtable discussion at the tag end: Following the clips of Hillary Regina at the DLC meeting, they posed the question: "Is Hillary Running?"

Bill Kristol and Mort Kondracke commented that (1) Yes, she is running; (2) There was a question of when. The panel (absent Mara L and Fred B) was split: They could not agree on whether HR would honor her 'promise' to NY voters to serve out her senate term. Wheeee. Bubbette Rex honor a promise?????? Pay a price for not honoring a promise? What a hoot!

Kristol thought she should could not afford to wait until 2008. I don't agree with him about much, but, yes, for HR - '08 is too late.

This is interesting in that even the allegedly conservative media in 2002 is now bandying about the idea of the Return of the Borg - a Clinton back in as VPOTUS or worse.

Just watch: HR has a terminally blind electorate to work with, Republican opponents committed to a faulty 'High Road' strategy, a totally compliant media and a murderous political machine underestimated by most. We have enough clues now to assemble the scenario. She is running and will run in '04. McAuliffe & Crew have already initiated the street sweeping activities: Sharpton cleared out of the road, for instance.

Freepers are an anomaly in the body politic. HR may be radioactive for us and others in the 'red' territory of the now famous map, but with media complicity (the fourth estate is a fifth column) there is a significant probability statistic to be assigned to her elevation to some position of greater power. This thought is sickening. Ein Volk. Ein Reich. Eine Fuehrerin.

Blessings on Freepers Everywhere.