Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary is politically stupid (El Rushbo NAILS it!)
Rush Limbaugh .com ^ | 07/30/02 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/30/2002 6:43:28 PM PDT by Libloather

Who Was In The White House When...

On Tuesday, I rolled a clip of Hillary Rodham Clinton begging us to turn back the clock - and I administered the 17-question test you see below. Hil grabbed all the press at Monday's big Democratic Leadership Council powwow. The DLC is a group of Democrats that ostensibly (and I don't buy this) want to move the party to the center from the left. Hillary basically told them that we have to go back to Clintonism. She's even described as a "moderate" in one AP story! It's laughable.

Hillary and all these other Democrat presidential wannabees are talking about repealing the Bush tax cut now, and blaming him for the supposedly bad economy - which is strong - and the corporate scandals. They don't have the courage of Walter Mondull in 1984 to say he would raise your taxes, but that's what they always do. From Daschle to Lieberman to John F. Kerry, they all marched up to the platform to blame Bush for everything under the sun, as you can hear in the audio link below.

After his speech, Joe Lieberman even had the audacity to tell CNN's Judy Woodruff that he never liked the class warfare of the Algore campaign - his campaign. These guys are a mess, because we all know that the only play in their playbook is class warfare. Hillary knows it too - and the buzz from this event was that she stole the show by blasting Bush and defending her husband's administration.

If you go back and look at the Clinton years, Hillary devised all the strategy that landed them in trouble with Paula Jones. She embroiled them in all of the lawsuits. I mean, she's stupid - politically stupid! Somebody has to say it. I mean, this speech is an example of her blowing away her Democrat rivals? You know, if she had blown away her husband, the legacy might be different today. But she didn't.

EIB minimum competency test

To help Hillary answer the question of where the corporate corruption came from truthfully, I submit the following minimum competency test:

1. Who was in the White House when Enron and Citigroup, with the help of former Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, were concealing billions in bad debt from investors, the public and the government?

2. Who was in the White House when Adelphia and Global Crossing were making insiders like DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe rich, and concealed the bad debt from investors, the public and the government?

3. Who was in the White House when the stock market began to tank, reducing all those 401-K accounts?

4. Who was in the White House when the Justice Department sought to destroy Microsoft, and the investors and employees who relied on that company?

5. Who was in the White House when federal taxes were increased on Social Security recipients?

6. Who was in the White House when funds were diverted from military and intelligence spending, despite repeated terrorist attacks on American citizens by Al-Qaeda both here and abroad, to massively increase domestic spending?

7. Who was in the White House when the Sudanese government made repeated offers to help the United States capture Osama bin Laden - offers which were ignored?

8. Who was in the White House when the Red Chinese were given technology to help them build long-range nuclear missiles aimed at the United States?

9. Who was in the White House when our Justice Department was turned into a criminal defense team to protect the president, first lady and vice president of the United States?

10. Who was in the White House when pardons were sold to the highest bidder, furniture that was nailed to the White House floor was moved to Chappaqua, and the White House was vandalized in the final days of the prior administration?

11. Which first lady, with no experience whatsoever, made a $100,000 profit on a $1,000 investment over a 10-month period in the cattle futures market?

12. Which senator timed the signing of a multimillion-dollar book deal a few days prior to being sworn into office to avoid Senate ethics rules?

13. Which president was the only president in American history to set up a legal defense fund?

14. Which president was the only elected president in American history to be impeached?

15. Which president was the only president to be held in contempt of court for lying to a federal judge?

16. Which president was the only president to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit?

17. Which president was the only president accused of rape?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: enviralists; hillary; kerry; lieberman; stupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: KLT
Way to go, KLT! Bump!
61 posted on 07/31/2002 7:23:07 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Standing on the Senate floor holding up the NYPost the day the front page said "BUSH KNEW" in 10 million point type was her typical left-footed move. No one with the brains or political smarts God gave a pineapple believes this or would do this.
62 posted on 07/31/2002 7:30:48 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Brit Hume's hour on Fox News last night (July 30) had a roundtable discussion at the tag end: Following the clips of Hillary Regina at the DLC meeting, they posed the question: "Is Hillary Running?"

Bill Kristol and Mort Kondracke commented that (1) Yes, she is running; (2) There was a question of when. The panel (absent Mara L and Fred B) was split: They could not agree on whether HR would honor her 'promise' to NY voters to serve out her senate term. Wheeee. Bubbette Rex honor a promise?????? Pay a price for not honoring a promise? What a hoot!

Kristol thought she should could not afford to wait until 2008. I don't agree with him about much, but, yes, for HR - '08 is too late.

This is interesting in that even the allegedly conservative media in 2002 is now bandying about the idea of the Return of the Borg - a Clinton back in as VPOTUS or worse.

Just watch: HR has a terminally blind electorate to work with, Republican opponents committed to a faulty 'High Road' strategy, a totally compliant media and a murderous political machine underestimated by most. We have enough clues now to assemble the scenario. She is running and will run in '04. McAuliffe & Crew have already initiated the street sweeping activities: Sharpton cleared out of the road, for instance.

Freepers are an anomaly in the body politic. HR may be radioactive for us and others in the 'red' territory of the now famous map, but with media complicity (the fourth estate is a fifth column) there is a significant probability statistic to be assigned to her elevation to some position of greater power. This thought is sickening. Ein Volk. Ein Reich. Eine Fuehrerin.

Blessings on Freepers Everywhere.
63 posted on 07/31/2002 8:19:12 AM PDT by esopman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Just proving a point that Laura dressed repectfully for the occasion while Hillary showed her disrespect. You may refer to it as being third grade if you prefer. That's your right. As it is mine to prove a point. Hope you have a nice day. :)
64 posted on 07/31/2002 9:56:13 AM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: antivenom

65 posted on 07/31/2002 12:18:35 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim

66 posted on 07/31/2002 12:22:47 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: KLT
"You know, if she had blown away her husband, the legacy might be different today. But she didn't."

Apparently, that's what interns are for...MUD

67 posted on 07/31/2002 12:29:53 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: esopman
You forgot one other thing - she has sold her soul to the devil.
68 posted on 07/31/2002 12:42:45 PM PDT by austingirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
You forgot the only President to lose his law license for purjuring himself!
69 posted on 07/31/2002 12:45:59 PM PDT by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
"No one with the brains ... God gave a pineapple believes this ..." Then there's nothing to worry about.
70 posted on 07/31/2002 1:17:24 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
Reaming her for dressing badly cheapens the good reasons people have for not liking her. Peace ;-)
71 posted on 07/31/2002 1:23:01 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Hah, Hah, Hah, you're a funny guy MUD.....

Come on down to Libville....we need some normal people to visit....

OMG did I say that? You might have to leave Mrs. MUD at home...we have enough libs...LOL

72 posted on 07/31/2002 1:28:32 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
"Was not Doris Kearns Goodwin LBJs Monica?"

Ewww...yechh!! DKG?! Then again...LBJ?! Ewwww...double-yuck!!

LOL...MUD

73 posted on 07/31/2002 1:34:05 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
I'm sure she's testing the waters, but it doesn't look like she's in a particular hurry to jump in.

I agree.

Hillary could probably have the '04 Democrat presidential nomination with a word but she isn't about to make any decisive moves for awhile. Hillary is just flexing her political muscle to see what the reaction is. She has to see what develops with the economy this year and how Republicans do in November. A recovering market and a big Republican victory in Congressional seats will probably cool her ardor quickly for '04. Hillary likes a sure thing and she must know that she's weak outside of the northeast and California. Throw in the ramifications of a possible war with Iraq and other variables and anything could still happen, including Hillary deciding that she can't beat the popular Bush and that '08 would provide a clearer path to the White House.

I once underestimated Hillary. I assumed she wouldn't run for Senator from New York because she was afraid to lose. Well, to my dismay, Hillary ran, was totally protected by the media at every step and the voters in New York elected her, although she had never lived in their state and was obviously a political novice in many respects. A weak Republican opponent helped a lot but still, she won, and now we have the presidency to consider.

I believe that Hillary will run in '04 if the economy is weakened even more and Bush looks vulnerable. The media will celebrate her entry into the race non-stop for weeks on end and she'll be pampered and protected 100% while Bush would be forced to soft-pedal his campaign against Mrs. Clinton, as Lazio did. If that lying, personality-challenged, robotic idiot Al Gore could come as close as he did to winning in 2000, Hillary Rodham Clinton has an excellent chance to pull it off.

Watch her and be worried. We elected a Jimmy Carter and a Bill Clinton (twice!) so a Hillary as President is quite possible. FR may be on to her but unfortunately, many millions apparently are not and with a savvy campaign and the total support of the media, she could win.

74 posted on 07/31/2002 2:04:12 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
I don't see it. But I could be wrong. Time will tell.
75 posted on 07/31/2002 2:52:57 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Thanks so much for posting this. I am going to save it until I get something from the liberal apologist on my e-mail list & then I am going to sock it to him.
76 posted on 07/31/2002 3:08:07 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
I too underestimated the nature of the NY electorate, the weak-kneed approach to such combat by the Republicans and the determination of Hillary Regina.

Once bitten, twice shy.

Now, I generally concur with you. She has a sophisticated, maniacal machine behind her. My profession is in the private stock transaction arena and the unfortunate conclusion I reached is that the economy will not recover in sufficient time or to a sufficient degree to help Bush.

You're right: If Al Borg nearly pulled it off, his more demoniacal female counterpart can too. He is currently her greatest obstacle. This will be very interesting to watch.

I fear, however, that while HR is a long shot for POTUS, she is not a long shot for Secy of State or VPOTUS pre-08. This is profoundly depressing.

Blessings on Freepers Everywhere.
77 posted on 07/31/2002 3:16:35 PM PDT by esopman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Only did it to show how SHE TRIED to cheapen the Inaugural ceremonies which should be respected no matter who is coming into office. I really don't agree this "wardrobe" issue will make any difference in those who do not like her for other very legitimate reasons. This was to show how arrogant she is. Anyway, that's my story and I'm stickin' to it. :) Yes, peace to all.
78 posted on 07/31/2002 5:01:57 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
You're having a morbid fantasy. Hillary isn't attractive. To think she tries to be unattractive is a stretch. To think she tries to be unattractive so that people will think less of the attractive people around her is beyond the pale. Listen to yourself.
79 posted on 07/31/2002 8:03:58 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
You SHOULD be worried about her...she knows the IQ of the American voter and only needs to stay one click above that....say, 75?.............She'll be a formidable candidate, her sliminess aside.

This bears repeating.

80 posted on 07/31/2002 8:14:27 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson