Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Andrew Wiggin
It's interesting to note that while he did eventually win a Nobel Prize for one of these papers, it wasn't the one on Relativity but rather the one on photosynthesis.

Actually, it was the photoelectric effect. Truth be told, that was probably the more significant paper, it being one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics pervades modern technology; relativity does not.

41 posted on 07/30/2002 6:28:04 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
You're right of course. Not only did I say photosynthesis, I said it twice.
54 posted on 07/31/2002 12:24:49 AM PDT by Andrew Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
Actually, it was the photoelectric effect.

I believe you are mistaken. He received the Nobel Prize for describing Brownian motion.

73 posted on 07/31/2002 12:32:56 PM PDT by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson