Skip to comments.
IRS reveals smoking gun [with Clinton's prints all over it]
Chicago Sun Times ^
| 2-29-2002
| Robert Novak
Posted on 07/29/2002 11:30:15 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 381-382 next last
To: BluH2o
Please keep up with the program, dear....
FBI Raids Hillary's Warehouse in Whitewater Deja Vu 06/25/02
An excerpt:
The FBI raid may also be a sign that the reported no prosecution deal for the Clintons, demanded by Democrat leaders as the price for President Bush getting some of his legislative agenda implemented, is beginning to unravel - since Democrats seem to have kept little if any of their part of the bargain.
To: Mo1; Askel5; MissAmericanPie
"I still think JW should have their book looked at regardless of whether or not Clinton had anything to do with it"Based on what evidence? And don't tell me that your personal dislike of Klayman is sufficient enough probable cause to audit Judicial Watch.
To: Clara Lou
Thanks for the ping. I had read this from the other thread of the same article. I noticed it took the 'eww' over a year to find something he could use to try and connect the dots about it being a political audit. I don't see a thing yet to tie the Clintons to it other than they were notified of a solitication from the 'eww'. Then an audit notification was sent to 'eww' and some six months later Rangel also begin to complain along with others. I'm sure the IRS gets letters of concern form many politicos all the time.
The easiest way for the 'eww' to prove his case since he claims purity is to get the audit behind him and if clean then he has huge PR material to bash all concerned, IRS, both administrations, Congress, etc. But until he proves he's clean it's only a PR ploy by 'eww'.
Because no one is above the law.......
Let the audit begin
63
posted on
07/29/2002 1:15:12 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Uncle Bill; rdavis84; rdf
Ping!
To: Grampa Dave
Do you mean Judicial Watch or the IRS blood suckers? I take it that's a rhetorical question. :-(
To: DoughtyOne
You're quite welcome!
To: FreedominJesusChrist; Wordee
Exactly, and this is ultimately the hypocrisy of the Klayman bashers here. They will sit and complain over situations Klayman cannot control, but will not hold people like Ashcroft and Bush accountable, when they refuse to investigate these crimes. To note:
The Bush administration are NOT publicity hounds as JW (Klayman) and his friends the Clintons are. They will NOT try who they are pursuing PUBLICLY in the MEDIA before they are brought to TRIAL. Do you not understand this? If you DO understand this, then what level of SECURITY CLEARANCE do you have to inform us that the DOJ is NOT "Doing anything about it". Are you LEAKING priveledged information that is CONFIDENTIAL from the DOJ? Are you THAT close to them?
Interesting.
I think your type judges by mere APPEARANCES without KNOWING the TRUTH and FACTS. But then, most ALL Klayman/Keyes people are this way.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
If JW has nothing to hide .. open the books
68
posted on
07/29/2002 1:17:47 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Now that there is proof showing that the Clintons did have the IRS audit their political enemies, you are side-stepping previous claims. That is hypocrisyDid the Clinton administration that SENT the FANS EMAIL to the IRS REQUEST the IRS audit JW?
To: DoughtyOne
"I'll be waiting for the usual Judicail Watch bashers to drop by for their portion
of humble pie. However, I'm not holding my breath."
If anything good comes out of this for anyone other than Judicial Watch, I'll come back for my helping of humble pie. Humbleberries, YUMMERS!
But I suspect I'll still be eating apple pie years from now.
70
posted on
07/29/2002 1:19:24 PM PDT
by
kitkat
To: FreedominJesusChrist
And don't tell me that your personal dislike of Klayman is sufficient enough probable cause to audit Judicial Watch.
Why not? Your love of Lary Klayman is enough reason for you to support an investigation of Dick Cheney and Halliburton!
To: FreedominJesusChrist
So this is your defense of this politically motivated IRS audit? Your argument supporting these illegal actions by the IRS is sickening. It is clearly obvious that Judicial Watch's records are so clean, that neither the Clinton White House, nor the IRS, could find any other reasonable exuse, besides truly devious political motivation, to audit Judicial Watch. Where do you READ in my COMMENT that I am supporting ILLEGAL ACTIONS by the IRS?
I never said in my post ANYTHING about the IRS. I would like LARRY (JW) to have the INTEGRITY to PROVIDE his books publicly. I am SURE he is CLEAN. It is OBVIOUS to you, isn't it?
But I am sure the people at Judicial Watch are very nice
To: Paul Atreides
"Nothing will come of it. If the Clintons dropped an A-Bomb on Republican HQ, the Republicans would apologize to them for not being at ground zero."
Yes, many others of us feel like Igor, too.
John Ashcroft is no better at bringing justice to Justice than the last occupant of that position and the same goes for W.
I am seeing people here who want just what Clinton achieved, selective enforcement of the law. Some people are above the law. Right now those people happen to be Bush types and next go round it will be whoever is in power.
Have we gone insane? Where is "equal treatment" under the law? We have become entirely blinded to anything the Constitution has to say and certainly Bush & Co. has evicted any idea of support for the Bill of Rights. Instead we have selective enforcement of the law.
73
posted on
07/29/2002 1:22:23 PM PDT
by
Spirited
To: Clara Lou
Do you think that it's possible that an IRS audit can start out as politically motivated but is nevertheless become a legitimate inquiry into obvious and serious irregularities? I do.
74
posted on
07/29/2002 1:24:18 PM PDT
by
Iwo Jima
To: Iwo Jima
I do too. As deport said, The easiest way for the 'eww' to prove his case since he claims purity is to get the audit behind him and, if clean, then he has huge PR material to bash all concerned, IRS, both administrations, Congress, etc. But until he proves he's clean it's only a PR ploy by 'eww'.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Like people with a damn brain did not know that the IRS does political audits . Oh please . Go ahead and have your orgasm about being in the same room with greatness , but someday step off of that cloud .
You will submit the comment you wrote the other day I assume .
76
posted on
07/29/2002 1:27:39 PM PDT
by
Ben Bolt
To: Iwo Jima; Howlin; Amelia; Southflanknorthpawsis; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; LurkerNoMore!; ned
These same JW people want audits by the Bush Admin via the IRS of Rainbow Push and others. Are they politicially motivated?
But I am sure the peopla at Judicial Watch are very nice
To: Clara Lou; FreedominJesusChrist
Bump for the cold hard facts .
78
posted on
07/29/2002 1:30:46 PM PDT
by
Ben Bolt
To: Clara Lou
Bump for the cold hard facts .
79
posted on
07/29/2002 1:33:22 PM PDT
by
Ben Bolt
To: dorben; Joy Angela
"Go ahead and have your orgasm about being in the same room with greatness , but someday step off of that cloud ."I believe that you are actually referring to something that Joy Angela wrote the other day. Nonetheless, you are still twisting her words.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 381-382 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson