If the government can have it’s innocence accepted despite the evidence against it, allow Jim Traficant to have his innocence accepted because there was no evidence against him.Oh please, who do you think you are kidding? Traficant was and is corrupt, and there's plenty of evidence (including testimony from non-felons) to back it up. It's a miracle he escaped jail for as long as he did.
- exodus
You didn’t watch the House Ethics Committee in action if you still believe that Traficant is guilty. I listened to Traficant’s evidence.
Traficant is innocent.
I brought up Waco, yes. Our government committed premeditated murder there, murder planned and orchestrated at the highest levels of our government.
I could bring up Ruby Ridge, too. That was also a case of premeditated murder.
You believe that your government is capable of murder, Mr. Bird.
Why do you consider your government too good to frame a man that fought against governmental abuses?
I believe that my government is capable of framing a man that fought against governmental abuses. With Mr. Traficant, no framing was necessary.
I brought up Waco, yes. Our government committed premeditated murder there, murder planned and orchestrated at the highest levels of our government.THAT'S what you've been told - by a group (and groups) with their OWN agendas to promote.
NEVER MIND that McNulty and crew assembled video footage OUT OF SEQUENCE according to real events.
NEVER MIND that he and his crew became known and gained fame because of 'very loose' playing with what he deemed to be 'the facts'.
Producing hte kind of propaganda like he produced would have made Goebels proud ... and when the soft-headed in America lap that kind of dribble up - I just *know* it's over for logic in America.
It's time to head back to the caves and start over -
- as MANKIND has FAILED in the use of his intellect and finally allowed his HEART to be won over by sheer emotionalism via video-producing con-artists out to make money damning the real facts all the while ...