Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush is becoming downright dangerous
Toronto Sun ^ | 7/28/02 | ERIC MARGOLIS

Posted on 07/29/2002 5:02:09 AM PDT by Boonie Rat

July 28, 2002

Bush is becoming downright dangerous

By ERIC MARGOLIS -- Contributing Foreign Editor

NEW YORK -- Of all the bad ideas that have been pouring from the Bush administration - the faux war on terrorism, the Palestine mess, invading Iraq, curtailment of civil liberties, unilateralism, growing deficits, farm subsidies, steel tariffs - among the very worst is the dangerous proposal that U.S. military forces be given domestic police powers.

Bush administration officials, notably the chief of the newly created Northern Command, Gen. Ralph Eberhart, have been calling for the Pentagon to assume a much greater domestic role in the so-called war against terrorism. A role, apparently, that would give the military power to conduct investigations and surveillance, use troops to "maintain order and security" and arrest American citizens. Canadians might be next, since Canada has been involuntarily placed under the U.S. Northern Command.

This frightening plan comes on the heels of Bush's cutely named but sinister TIPs program, a network of citizen informers that recalls evil memories of ubiquitous Soviet and Chinese civilian informers, children denouncing parents, and East Germany, where a quarter of the adult population spied for the Stasi secret police.

In the magisterial Roman Republic, father of all our western democracies, consular armies were forbidden by law to enter the city. The Romans realized over 2,400 years ago that soldiers had to be strictly kept out of politics. The Roman Republic died during the 1st century BC civil wars after military leaders Marius, Sulla and, later, Caesar, brought their armies into politics.

America's Congress - which was patterned on the Roman Senate - clearly recalled this history when it passed the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which outlawed the use of federal military forces for domestic law enforcement. Congress was intent on maintaining supremacy of civilian rule and protecting civil liberties. Properly restrained, the military was a useful tool; unrestrained, a dangerous and ruthless master.

Soldiers are trained to kill enemies, not to perform complex police duties that require professionalism, restraint and knowledge of the law. Long, painful experience around the world has repeatedly shown that once the military is brought in to "maintain order" or perform policing, it almost inevitably becomes corrupted, despotic and politicized.

One need only look at the doleful history of Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria, Egypt, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Chile and Venezuela to see that when soldiers take over internal security, they inevitably end up taking over the government as well. When soldiers are allowed to police, they suddenly realize their latent power and go from being second-class citizens to cocks of the walk. Law quickly gives way before raw power. Those who have served in the military - as this writer has - have a healthy fear of military justice and its drumhead implementation.

Interestingly, the Soviet communists were even more sensitive to this threat. Lenin repeatedly warned of "Bonapartism" and urged the party to keep control of internal security and police in the hands of civilians.

The Posse Comitatus Act was amended by the Reagan administration to allow use of the military in an earlier bogus "war" - the war on drugs.

In this case, the military was sent to identify and intercept drug smugglers outside America's borders. At the time, the idea seemed reasonable. But in retrospect, the inflow of drugs has barely been reduced while the military has ended up with a boot in the door of domestic law enforcement.

In 1997, Congress gave the military the power to co-operate with other government departments in countering biological or chemical attacks. This made sense because the military had an arsenal of biowarfare detection, neutralization gear, vaccines and the training to use them. But Congress expressly forbade the military from arresting civilians during biowarfare operations.

Now, some of the far-rightists who populate the darker corners of the Bush administration are using public fear and hysteria generated by incessant claims of imminent nuclear or biowarfare attack to press for what amounts to the beginning of national martial law. We hear calls for greater surveillance of phones and e-mail. Next will come calls for limits on speech and dissent. George Orwell laid out this whole grim process in his epochal novel, 1984. Anyone who wants a feel of what martial law would be like should see the gripping Burt Lancaster film about a Pentagon coup against the White House, Seven Days in May.

Fortunately, Congress, much of the top brass and even Pentagon super-hawk Donald Rumsfeld seem opposed to this daft idea. Good for them. Separation of the civil and military is even more basic and sacred an American concept than separation of church and state.

The voice Americans should be listening to is that of the closest thing the United States had to a noble Roman tribune - former president Dwight Eisenhower. As this great American and former general was leaving office, he warned his people that the gravest threat they faced was not from abroad but from their own military-industrial complex.

The U.S. has ample civilian law enforcement agencies to ensure domestic security - perhaps too many. Americans don't need soldiers to act as super-cops. Osama bin-Laden and the far right must not be allowed to stampede the U.S. into military policing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eric can be reached by e-mail at margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com. Letters to the editor should be sent to editor@sunpub.com or visit his home page.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 07/29/2002 5:02:09 AM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
What a piece of garbage. You forgot the barf alert
2 posted on 07/29/2002 5:04:20 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Yep..hold your little dog close to you and click your heels three times repeating "there are no terrorists, there are no terrorists, there are no terrorists"...and maybe when you wake up you will see that a nation that doesnt or wont control its borders,profile terrorists, and passes out free citizenship like holloween candy has no choice but do do as is being done....
Imagine what road the Clinton and the Gore would have taken...
3 posted on 07/29/2002 5:15:10 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
I suggest that the author of this letter not visit the US and he can remain feeling safe.
4 posted on 07/29/2002 5:16:34 AM PDT by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Interesting post. Thank you.
5 posted on 07/29/2002 5:19:39 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
the military has ended up with a boot in the door of domestic law enforcement


6 posted on 07/29/2002 5:21:05 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Just so I understand your position. You support "re-evaluating" the Posse Comitatus Act, and TIPs, etc. so the government can make you safer? And support giving the military power to conduct investigations and surveillance, use troops to "maintain order and security" and arrest American citizens.

Boonie Rat

MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66

7 posted on 07/29/2002 5:23:41 AM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Thank you for the photo. Let us not forget.
8 posted on 07/29/2002 5:24:23 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Why, it's for the chillun, you unpatriotic swine!
9 posted on 07/29/2002 5:25:04 AM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Margolis hasn't been the same since 9/11, and has gone off into the fever swamps with some others on the Right.What a shame, he used to read as well as a Paul Johnson, and was an interesting voice in Canadin journalism and a good tonic against the bland left consensus up here.

No more.
10 posted on 07/29/2002 5:26:43 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Using US troops to arrest Canadian citizens sounds like a swell idea to me. Let's start with Peter Jennings.
11 posted on 07/29/2002 5:27:33 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I think you're on to something, eh ?
12 posted on 07/29/2002 5:29:16 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I see no problem with the article.
13 posted on 07/29/2002 5:36:00 AM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nygoose
Why should Congress want the military arresting people? If the military is not trained to be a police force, it should stick to that which it is prepared to do: logistics, surveillence and information gathering. &;-)
14 posted on 07/29/2002 5:39:48 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
"Why should Congress want the military arresting people? If the military is not trained to be a police force, it should stick to that which it is prepared to do: logistics, surveillence and information gathering. &;-)"

No, the military is trained to close with and destroy the enemy. All else is merely in support of that mission. The military themselves don't want anything to do with domestic policing.

15 posted on 07/29/2002 5:47:53 AM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Haven't you heard about the "Thou shalt no criticize Bush" rule? The mere mention of his signing of CFR will get you called a Bush basher.
16 posted on 07/29/2002 5:52:49 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
The U.S. Government has a myriad of ways and employees to investigate, arrest, confiscate, intimidate, frighten and punish. Some might even say it has too many options and too much power.
17 posted on 07/29/2002 6:06:13 AM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nygoose
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." Thomas Jefferson

A coming revolution toward the imbalance of power won't come in my lifetime ... but I believe the pendulum will swing. &;-)

18 posted on 07/29/2002 6:16:50 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Sgt. Fury
Bump!
20 posted on 07/29/2002 6:44:24 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson