Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: A Democrat in Republican clothing?
Source: Washington Times ^ | 07/28/2002 | By Nicholas M. Horrock

Posted on 07/28/2002 6:24:02 PM PDT by Lazamataz

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:55:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON, July 28 (UPI) -- When President Franklin Roosevelt, a member of one of the most wealthy and prominent families in America, was constructing the New Deal, which brought forth the Securities and Exchange Commission, strong banking regulation and labor protections, he was excoriated as a traitor to his class. Even one his own family members wrote him to complain.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
We ignore this editorial at our own peril.
1 posted on 07/28/2002 6:24:02 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Registered; sneakypete; Abundy; Sabertooth
Disgruntled conservative bump.
2 posted on 07/28/2002 6:26:36 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Bush a Democrat in Republican clothing?

Welcome to Kansas, Toto!

3 posted on 07/28/2002 6:28:34 PM PDT by nonliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Bush a Democrat in Republican clothing?

No, he is just a 'third way' politician in a business suit. A nice guy, though.

4 posted on 07/28/2002 6:32:51 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
VERY VERY UPSET CONSERVATIVE BUMP
5 posted on 07/28/2002 6:34:16 PM PDT by SamBees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
no less a supply-sider than Jude Wanniski sent a warning to House leaders that forcing firms to report stock options as a business expense, where the investors would see it, would have chilling effect on the entrepreneurs who built the boom of the dot.coms.

Yeah, and we all know how well those dot.coms have done, huh?

I don't pretend to understand all the ins and outs of what has transpired with this stock market, but I do know that unless and until the confidence of the average person in the management, reporting and oversight of companies returns, it will be a long slow climb out of this. Investors have been shaken to their bones by the deception practiced by a few large companies, but because of those few, most stocks suffered, and as a result folks lost earnings and retirement funds.

As a comment on the article itself, I believe Pres. Bush has in mind the reorganization of Govt. in order to rein in some of the bloat that has been created over the years. He won't be able to do it overnight, or even in year or two. It is my understanding that the new Dept. of Homeland Security will pull together and replace several agencies which had been charged with the protection of the nation, but were sometimes working at cross purposes with other agencies. It is my understanding that those other agencies will be closed, thus ending those costs and they will be absorbed in to the new dept.

6 posted on 07/28/2002 6:35:10 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
wiping over a trillion dollars in assets

Why do people regard "market capitalization" as a number that means something? If a company sells 100,000 shares at $10 each, someone sells 100 of those shares for $100 each, and that's the last trade of the day, the company's "market capitalization" is $10,000,000 (100,000 shares times $100/share) even though investors only put $1,000,000 into the company. There is also no way that investors, on a whole, could get anything close to $10,000,000 out of the company (some might get more, but only if others lose money). What, then, is the meaning of the $10,000,000 "market capitalization" figure?

7 posted on 07/28/2002 6:37:14 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The first bush act was to fight for a sizable tax cut. Bush respects the men and women in the military and for keeping it strong. Bush expects and demands ethics from businessmen. Bush appoints judges who respect the law instead of creating it. Bush wants a strong and effective public school system. The last point while a noble one, is probably where he has gone off the reservation. The public school system, like any monopoly, can only be reformed by letting the free market work its will. Mostly, Bush is very republican.

Let's look at what a democrat really is. A democrat says one thing just to get votes and then does another to enrich himself. A democrat used to stand for the little guy. Now, a democrat gives the same speech but generally will do anything to stay in power and that includes screwing the little guy. I don't know what democrats stand for except money and power. This does not describe President Bush.

8 posted on 07/28/2002 6:39:03 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
bump
9 posted on 07/28/2002 6:40:12 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
It is my understanding that those other agencies will be closed, thus ending those costs and they will be absorbed in to the new dept.

One would hope that would happen. In reality, though, government programs almost never go away.

10 posted on 07/28/2002 6:42:25 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
What is your opinion regarding the big CPA firms, how they are structured, and GAAP? Do you think the status quo is adequate? If you don't have an informed opinion on this, then your disgruntlement as to these matters strikes me as somewhat kneejerk. We would be better served to assess each issue on its merits, and opine when we are informed, and absent that ask intelligent question hoping for an informed response. JMO.
11 posted on 07/28/2002 6:43:27 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Ok Laz, it there a single democrat in the house or senate or governorship that you would prefer to Bush ? If you can not name one and I sure can't, then I fail to see how Bush is a democrat.
12 posted on 07/28/2002 6:44:02 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
But last week, as the accounting bill was in final debate, no less a supply-sider than Jude Wanniski sent a warning to House leaders that forcing firms to report stock options as a business expense, where the investors would see it, would have chilling effect on the entrepreneurs who built the boom of the dot.coms.

Yep, hide the ball. We don't want honest numbers reflecting the real economics to get in the way of dotcomers or other high tech types raising capital. Of course the jig is up anyway.

13 posted on 07/28/2002 6:46:06 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I expected better from Dubya than what we got from his father. My bad.
14 posted on 07/28/2002 6:47:08 PM PDT by Ipse Dixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
We ignore this editorial at our own peril.

Yeah, yeah. And if the stock market turns up (even if only slightly, as it has begun to do), the writer of this editorial will be wiping egg off his face and the cowardly Republican senators will be saying how smart George W. Bush is.

If Bush is such a Democrat, why are the Democrats attacking him?

15 posted on 07/28/2002 6:48:28 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
"What, then, is the meaning of the $10,000,000 'market capitalization' figure?"

It is neither less nor more meaningful than folks' 401(k) balances. They couldn't all cash-out and expect to get the dollar figure in their quarterly statement.

16 posted on 07/28/2002 6:51:07 PM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You can add me to the disgruntled conservative bump list. I've been in a Bush-bash state-of-mind ever since he signed CFR!
17 posted on 07/28/2002 6:52:20 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Oh I hope you have your asbestos long johns on, dude.

You are soooo in trouuubllleee....

18 posted on 07/28/2002 6:54:24 PM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Bush a Democrat in Republican clothing?

Not even close.

Quite a few people called Clinton the best president the Republicans could have had. Do you agree?

19 posted on 07/28/2002 6:55:02 PM PDT by WhiteKnuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Jude Wanniski sent a warning to House leaders that forcing firms to report stock options as a business expense, where the investors would see it would have chilling effect on the entrepreneurs who built the boom of the dot.coms.

This should send chills down the spine of every investor, conservative, and capitalist. Our trust may be misplaced, after all.

20 posted on 07/28/2002 6:56:15 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson