Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-16s Pursue Unknown Craft Over Region
Washington Post ^ | Saturday, July 27, 2002 | Steve Vogel

Posted on 07/27/2002 2:10:13 PM PDT by Pro Consul

Edited on 07/27/2002 2:11:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

"It was this object, this light-blue object, traveling at a phenomenal rate of speed," Rogers said. "This Air Force jet was right behind it, chasing it, but the object was just leaving him in the dust. I told my neighbor, 'I think those jets are chasing a UFO.' "

Military officials confirm that two F-16 jets from Andrews Air Force Base were scrambled early yesterday after radar detected an unknown aircraft in area airspace. But they scoff at the idea that the jets were chasing a strange and speedy, blue unidentified flying object.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alien; f16; paranormal; ufo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-353 next last
To: berned
Its not a matter of belief but rather a matter of fact , and the fact is that they are out there . Who is running the show is a whole different matter .

Myself and 3 of my fireteam saw the exact same thing on 2 consecutive nights and the aerocraft performed the exact same things in the sky .

I do not believe that they were US craft , but who knows . It was also interesting because it was nearly to the second on the hour on the same hill . Hill 722 on Oahu , 1980 . It was interesting .

121 posted on 07/27/2002 4:42:41 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
What I find really odd is that NORAD and the Air National Guard actually acknowledged the incident.
122 posted on 07/27/2002 4:43:18 PM PDT by berkeleybeej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Pro Consul
An interesting site:

www.bibleufo.com

123 posted on 07/27/2002 4:44:11 PM PDT by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Okay, let me again try and explain a few things.

First off, we do not fly our special toys over civilian airspace, especially airspace like the Wash DC area. Not going to happen.

Now, as far as the event. The radar returns can be explained in many ways, as the USAF spokesman stated. I offer what I consider a reasonable explanation why there were returns---slow speed returns, i.e., weather anomaly and/or a large group of bats/birds flying along. I’ve locked up a flock or two in my day and I assure you, it does happen, and scares the bee-jesus outta you when it happens at close range.

The alleged blue light is very likely the afterburner of the lead aircraft. The altitude of the aircraft, along with the location of the aircraft sighting, and the active runway at the time, tells me the F-16’s were likely on initial take-off, zipping along in after burner.

As far as “witnesses” and their testimony. No problem. I am a certified and experienced mishap investigator. I investigated several aircraft mishaps, two involved fatalities. I am also a former Texas policeman from many years ago. So, speaking from direct experience, let me tell you eyewitness accounts are highly unreliable, and when it comes to aerial events, unless its another pilot I don’t put too much weight in what the average citizen says. I have head too many times directly opposing “eyewitness” testimony. Anyway, the speed of the aircraft along with the parallax error involved, the lateness of the hour (1 am), along with the fact I do not know the sobriety/wakefullness of the witnesses. . .well, you get the picture.

Now, the news report is instructive, as I can tell the reporter put a few words in the people’s mouths---they wouldn’t do that , misreport the news for sensational reasons, would they? Consider: “"(The jets) were right on its tail. As the thing would move, a jet was right behind it," Rogers recalls.” Now, see the use of “Jets” at the beginning of the statement, and the actual witness statement of “a jet right behind it” (singlular).

The news reports talks about people being shaken from their beds. I tell ya, if an F-16 with full AB is zipping by at low altitude, you would not have time to rise up off the couch and walk outside and see the jet. No way. The blue light was likely the AB, as by the time you went outside and looked up, the jet would have been passed your location--whicj brings up parallax errors. The statement that people saw “jets” (plural) chasing the light is suspect and probably not what was actually seen.

What happened was an anomalous radar return, the strip alert jets were launched in 10-sec (maybe 15 sec) trail formation, full AB on take-off to get to speed and get quickly on a vector to the return, and the people, NOT USED TO FULL AB TAKEOFFS at night, these poor people were stunned, confused and didn’t know what they saw. (Late night AB take-offs are prohibited at Andrews and have not been done for years and years, and as such, the locals would be sensitive to any AB takeoff and not know what they saw after being "shaken from their bed.")

That is it. Make up your own mind, but I caution you not to take too much from uninformed unreliable reporters, reporting on a subject they know nothing about (aviation and fighters and jets). I am surprised many accept at face value this reporting but dismiss those same reporters when it comes to any other subject—like politics. Reporters have been known to sensationalize the news, don’t ya know.
124 posted on 07/27/2002 4:44:49 PM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
Anybody else find it just a bit odd that the last "flap" over Washington DC was EXACTLY FIFTY YEARS AGO?

Maybe this is just someone's way of commemorating the UFO flap of 1952?

125 posted on 07/27/2002 4:46:09 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
I've always thought the F-4 had one of the most interesting and instantly recognizable profiles of any fighter aircraft.
126 posted on 07/27/2002 4:47:42 PM PDT by Prince Caspian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
The continuously blended fuselage on that would imply a low radar cross section... ;-)

in the day, i wouldn't have minded trying my stealth on her technology

127 posted on 07/27/2002 4:48:04 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Hello Art Bell

We have totally corrupt aliens running our government. We want new ones.
128 posted on 07/27/2002 4:50:26 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
FOFLOL !

preemptive strike
good move

129 posted on 07/27/2002 4:50:56 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I'd always heard that the F-4 had the fastest dash speed.

For a while, the F-4 held the time-to-climb record (something like maximum altitude achievable in 2 minutes from a standing start - sitting on the runway with full afterburner and brakes locked). The aircraft that held the record before the F-4 was the T-38 Talon (trainer).

130 posted on 07/27/2002 4:52:58 PM PDT by Prince Caspian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
I remember this media report doing the rounds back in the 1990's.

UK PRESS TOLD NOT TO REPORT BLACK TRIANGLE UFOs


UFO Magazine Says Media Got "D-Noticed" On Mystery Aircraft

A top BBC executive let slip recently that there is a D-Notice on media reporting of the so-called "Black Triangle."

The executive, who cannot be named, is the former producer of a very popular BBC science program. He told one of our team that the black triangle "craft," first witnessed by hundreds in the Hudson Valley region of the United States [mid 1980s], then by thousands in Belgium (1989-90) and more in Britain, has been "heavily D-Noticed" by the government. For this reason the BBC will not be reporting on the enigmatic craft, no matter how many witness reports they receive.

According to the former science program producer, the reason the government has seen fit to slap a restrictive notice on reporting of the Triangle is because -- so far as the government has secretly informed the BBC -- the craft is part of a new secret military project, and as such must be protected under the secrecy laws. If this is the case, however, it surely begs the question: If the so called Black Triangle is a secret military aircraft, then what is it doing hovering over residential areas and frightening people half to death? Something somewhere simply does not add up.

Here's the offical D-Notice website

131 posted on 07/27/2002 4:53:30 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
Okay, let me again try and explain a few things.

First off, we do not fly our special toys over civilian airspace, especially airspace like the Wash DC area. Not going to happen.

Now, as far as the event. The radar returns can be explained in many ways, as the USAF spokesman stated.

Is this a first draft of the "official" government explanation of what happened in the Washington DC area?

132 posted on 07/27/2002 4:53:54 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Has that pciture been goofed with or did it turn on it's afterburners or what? Never have seen jet cause that.
133 posted on 07/27/2002 4:54:19 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prince Caspian
it's sure one i wouldn't wanna see bearin' down on my hole with the wrong markings on it ..
134 posted on 07/27/2002 4:55:37 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: berned
I agree, although I'm somewhat shocked to see that this story has been picked up by major newspapers.

Call me a tinfoiler, but I have no doubt that UFOs (whatever they happen to be) are real.

Tinfoil off!

135 posted on 07/27/2002 4:57:26 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Is this a first draft of the "official" government explanation of what happened in the Washington DC area?

No. It's a sensible explanation offered by a former F15E fighter pilot.

Granted, it's not nearly as much fun as a Michael Rivero or Art Bell explanation, but it's far more reasonable and likely.

136 posted on 07/27/2002 4:58:23 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver
Just breaking the soundbarrier. Shockwave is moving down along the lines of the aircraft. Starts at the nose.
137 posted on 07/27/2002 4:59:23 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Pro Consul
Reply answer to you're question in post #1. Standard production F-16's have a fixed geometry inlet. thus limiting
the F-16's speed to little more than MACH 2. Jet engines cannot run on supersonic air entering the engine inlet. so the intake is shaped in such a way as to slow the air down inside the intake prior to entering the engine inlet guide vanes. An alternative to this principal is variable geometry
inlets or Variable Intake Ramps(more efficient in effecting
Supersonic Flight).
138 posted on 07/27/2002 4:59:24 PM PDT by Defender2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dorben
I am in total agreement with you. People who glibly explain away each and every UFO sighting don't realize how silly they sound after the 42,497th glib shrug-off.

They remind me of clinton supporters who think it's perfectly reasonable that he fired the FBI director one day BEFORE Vince Foster "dies" then refuses to let the FBI investigate the crime scene. They see nothing fishy. They placidly accept the glib explanation that it's all just a buncha wacky ha-ha coincidences.

Now... care to venture who/what you think the UFO's really are, and what their agenda might be?

139 posted on 07/27/2002 4:59:30 PM PDT by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
Anybody else find it just a bit odd that the last "flap" over Washington DC was EXACTLY FIFTY YEARS AGO?

Yes, I found it odd right after I read your post. July 26, 1952 - July 26, 2002. A 50th anniversary flyby? Interesting.

140 posted on 07/27/2002 5:00:06 PM PDT by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson