Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Airline Pilot sues NTSB for "Zoom-climb" data
http://www.twa800.com/lahr/lahr-amended.htm ^ | 7/27/02 | John Fiorentino

Posted on 07/27/2002 8:30:11 AM PDT by JohnFiorentino

Retired airline Pilot Capt. Ray Lahr has brought suit against the NTSB for release of the data pertaining to the alleged "zoom-climb" by TWA800. NTSB has stated that this event was what the hundreds of witnesses observed prior to the TWA800 explosion.

You can view the amended complaint in it's entirety here:

http://www.twa800.com/lahr/lahr-amended.htm


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aviation; boeing; cia; fbi; ntsb; twa800list; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 981-990 next last
To: mach.08; snopercod
Good catch.
421 posted on 08/09/2002 12:12:31 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

Comment #422 Removed by Moderator

Comment #423 Removed by Moderator

To: jlogajan
Normally for level flight, the center of lift is positioned on top of the center of gravity.

THe wing's center of lift that is, if the overall center of lift was on the CG the aircraft would be unstable. The CL I believe moves when flaps are deflected or during a physical configuration of the wing that allows the CL to move aerodynamicaly such as when using vortex generators during certain portions of flight.

424 posted on 08/09/2002 12:33:34 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #425 Removed by Moderator

To: jlogajan
so it would naturally nose up and begin climbing.

It would do so only very briefly. The CG being moved rearwards make the plain exponentialy unstable. As a result, the more it pitches up, the greater the pitch up force. At high speeds that would have snaped the wings, at low speeds it would have stalled the airplane outright. As for the engine thrust, it would have had no impact when wings would snap, and during a stall it would have had negligble effect. Notwithstanding of course that the violent pitch up would most likely flip the airplane around the wing axis like a washing machine tumbler. Gain in altitude would be virtualy nil, and the airplane would quickly start droping like a rock.

426 posted on 08/09/2002 12:38:34 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #427 Removed by Moderator

Comment #428 Removed by Moderator

Comment #429 Removed by Moderator

To: mach.08
I have no idea what your point is.
430 posted on 08/09/2002 1:43:09 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
...or why what you just posted has anything to do with me.
431 posted on 08/09/2002 1:46:21 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: mach.08
You don't like to document your alleged "witness reports" for the readers , do you. Let's see those alleged "witness reports".

You also run away from the discussions about the timeline problem with the "shootdown" notion and obviously haven't yet been able to conjure up even a half way palatable "shootdown" timeline of your own. Read on.

The timeline and location of the major events of the TWA 800 disaster was approximately as follows:

8:31:11 Intact and climbing 747 approaches 13,800 feet.

8:31:12 Initiating Event at 13,800 feet followed immediately by the commencement of the decapitation process.

8:31:43-8:31:47 Streak of light appears.

8:31:47 Explosion of Massive Fireball at 5500-7500 feet.

8:31:55-8:31:57 Splashdown of the Massive Fireball flames.
Source.

From: George A Donaldson
Date: Thu Aug 8, 2002 12:55 pm
[quote]
There was more than one streak. One preceded the IE, one after preceding the MF. Two teats fell out of the MF but I don't consider them streaks. Witnesses claimed that they spiraled downward similar to a Chinese Elm's seed. If they were the two wings from the plane, that makes sense. Of course, if so, they were stubby wings since the outer tips tore off at the IE.
[end quote]

Yahoo TWA800 forum
From: George A Donaldson
Date: Wed Aug 7, 2002 9:57 am
[excerpt][quote] At :43, I figure that water impact has begun. The streak should have its beginning very shortly after the IE. It would amplify with time as noted by David McClaine. I would place a visible streak at around :25 or earlier. Meyer's observation supports this as well.
[end quote]

Yahoo TWA800 forum
From: Greg Salyards "wwwqwww"
Date: Fri Aug 9, 2002 10:29 am
[excerpt][quote][emphasis his]
The timeline and location of the major events of the disaster was approximately as follows:

8:31:11 Intact and climbing 747 approaches 13,800 feet.

PRIOR TO THIS TIME AN ORANGE 'STREAK/OBJECT/THINGY' WAS OBSERVED BY MULTIPLE WITNESSES MOVING TOWARD TWA 800. THE EARLIEST WITNESS SAW IT CROSS THE EAST RIVER NORTH OF ASTORIA, NY. IT WAS OBSERVED BY OTHERS TO BE SMALLER AND FASTER THAN A NORMAL AIRCRAFT. IT APPEARS TO HAVE FLOWN NORTH AND EAST OF WEST ISLIP, NY AND SOUTH AND WEST OF ISLIP AIRPORT. IT CROSSED THE BARRIER ISLAND EAST OF DAVIS PARK AND ULTIMATELY CROSSED THE TRACK OF TWA 800. IT EITHER FLEW THROUGH TWA 800 OR PAST TWA 800 JUST AT THE TIME OF THE INITIATING EVENT (IE). THERE MAY HAVE BEEN OBSERVATIONS OF ANOTHER STREAK AND/OR RADAR TRACK(S) PRIOR TO THE IE.

8:31:12 Initiating Event at 13,800 feet followed immediately by the commencement of the decapitation process.

8:31:43-8:31:47 Streak of light appears.

8:31:47 Explosion of Massive Fireball at 5500-7500 feet.

8:31:55-8:31:57 Splashdown of the Massive Fireball flames.

Greg
[end quote]

432 posted on 08/09/2002 2:03:06 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
AUTO-DELETE--Reported to moderators for libelous statements.
433 posted on 08/09/2002 2:06:21 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: mach.08
They only WISH it would go away!
434 posted on 08/09/2002 2:09:02 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

Comment #435 Removed by Moderator

Comment #436 Removed by Moderator

To: mach.08

Now, of course, any dunderhead would immediately recognize a missile in flight from that animated graphic portrayal by the legendary tinfoil hat, Ian Goddard. But the witnesses didn't see what the tinfoil hats' mantra says they saw, did they.

Dwight Brumley: "I could not positively say that what I saw was a missile. What I saw was a very bright flame of light moving parallel to my aircraft."
Source.

Fred Meyer: "I saw a streak of light in the sky. I have no idea what it was. And my reaction when I saw it was, what the hell is that?"
Source.

The "Missile Witnesses" Myth

437 posted on 08/09/2002 2:27:24 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Update!
438 posted on 08/09/2002 2:37:29 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
Hey, good idea. Maybe the moderators can find that Boeing statement you claim exists.
439 posted on 08/09/2002 2:47:11 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

Comment #440 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 981-990 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson