 "Please look right here..." |
Posted on 07/27/2002 8:10:12 AM PDT by steveo
"It was this object, this light-blue object, traveling at a phenomenal rate of speed," Rogers said. "This Air Force jet was right behind it, chasing it, but the object was just leaving him in the dust. I told my neighbor, 'I think those jets are chasing a UFO.' " Click link to read the rest of the story.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Hey, _Jim...if you think in this VAST universe you are the end all-be all of existence, you show the HEIGHT of arrogance...
Also it proves that if your vision is true and you are the Universe's example of the height of advancement,we'd all still live in caves with square wheels on our wagons.
A wet bird never flies at night.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
And just what has been your positive contribution to this thread, mongrel?
Or are you content to let every form of wild-eyed theory adorn this site (I take it you are NO conservative and in that case you ought to be banned)?
Please tell me that you have the right to VIOLATE the rules of this site with PERSONAL attacks contributing absolutely nothing to the ongoing discussion.
Please tell me you have have ANY relevant experience in ANY applicable field of technology (SciFi and Tom Clancey novels definitely DO NOT COUNT).
Please tell me what sort of BURR it is you've got under your saddle that causes you to inject completely worthless comments UNRELATED to the ongoing discussion.
(It's people like YOU are going to be the RUIN of society and it's STEADY and assured decline in civility ... what you're doing is just ANOTHER facet of the politics of personal destruction and I'm getting sick of it from worms like you.)
On every thread, all the time, spouting the gov't line.
All any one with a brain has to do is cross reference this across multiple threads...
Even an AOL user can now figure it out, if they can read...
|
"Please look right here..." |
Please tell me in 1000 words or less why little worms like you shouldn't be banned from this site and the face of this earth forever.
THEN, he posts this...AFTER he posts the previous comment in the same post...
Please tell me that you have the right to VIOLATE the rules of this site with PERSONAL attacks contributing absolutely nothing to the ongoing discussion.
Well, you started this, so, I'll finish it...
You are an OBVIOUS hack, and pop up ANYTIME there is any question on the Government's position on ANY topic with your attempt to muddy the waters/belittle anyone ELSE'S beliefs...
When you get presented with FACTS...you run like a scaleded dog...and start a cryfest apparently...
Does this mean I can expect an IRS audit soon, shill?
My scientific background is my business, unless you can access my files...but I have been in the Sciences for most of my adult life, as well as being a musician (I refuse to be a starving artist). What is YOUR Scientific background?
What have you EVER done that warrants ANY FReeper to EVER acknowlege YOUR posts, let alone TOLERATE YOU here...
Government Shill...BEGONE!
I understand your reasoning as it applies to UFO's, but this same reasoning could also be applied to any other objects that we can see in the sky including stars, planets, airplanes, birds, balloons, etc. Most people who look up and see something in the sky, whatever that something may be, would assume that what they see is actually there, whether it be an airplane or a bird or a UFO. But for whatever reason, some people who would look up and see an airplane and accept the fact that they see an airplane, upon seeing a UFO, would not accept the fact that they see a UFO. I think that what it comes down to is that those people who believe in UFO's accept the fact that they may exist, and those people who don't believe in UFO's won't accept the fact that they may exist, despite any "evidence" to the contrary.
My guess is that _jimmy works for the ADL. He must, or else real author of that story...nevermind.
PS: Do an 'article' search on '_Jim', you should get one story and an interesting addy.
(Jim - Your objection to this story lends it some credibility - shhhhhh!)
More to the point, if _Jim posts it, seriously consider the opposite.
Regards,
PS: correctoin - title search with '_jim' - then go to last post. I posted 'article search' prevoiusly.
You are such a pathetic shill.For the record you:
A) contributed NOTHING to the discussion.
B) failed to DISCOUNT anything I posted.
Would you like to put the brain in gear and try again?
And you sonny-boy are still sore that I bested you in logical argument - an easy feat I might add ...
Get over it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.