It is a sad day indeed when American Citizens need to request....
11. I ask that a Certified Copy of the State and U.S. Constitutions be entered into evidence, as well as a certified copy of the judge's oath of office.
I pray he win's, Keep us posted!! Live Free or Die Trying, Huge 2ed Amendment Bumps!
1. The law is whatever the Judges say it is.
2. Judges stick together to support their power
to say the law is what ever they say it is.
The Judges said the word abortion does appear in the constitution. They say it is in the part where the constitution says that abortion is legal. Since you or I can't see that part, the judges, said it was in the penumbra of the constitution. Only judges can see penumbra. According to the judges it exists. It is just that you and I have to take their word for it. Your right to be armed is not in the constitution even though you can read the words that say you the right. You see the penumbra says you don't have any such right. A judge's penumbra always prevails over the words you see or don't see on the parchment.
When will the Libertarian fools understand that what the Supreme court ruled in 1804 has never been successfully challenged. Justise Marshall ruled in 1804 that the courts and only the courts had the right to say what was and was not in the constitution. The constitution was designed to be a self evident document. A self evident document or statement does not need interpretation. We all talk in self evident speech all the time. Self evident language is what our society depends on. "Gimme a Big Mac Extra Value Meal with a Coke" is self evident. "Congress shall make no law" is self evident. But the courts ruled in 1804 that the constituion is not self evident. Did you ever wonder how any teen ager can determine what you mean when you give them an order at McDonalds... but jugdes have to ponder and interpret what "Congress shall make no law" means.
What it means is that Justice Marshall in 1804 assumed the right to tell us what words with clear meaning meant. It is about judicial power and not the meaning or interpretation of words. Expecting judges to rule as the words clearly mean is stupid. Judges are about power to rule as they see fit, not about the meaning of words on a parchment.
The only thing that matters is who gets to be a judge. If the right people are on the court they will rule properly. The right people would rule properly even if there were no constitution. When the wrong people are on the courts they rule wrongly, no matter what the words of the constitution actualy say.
The man is going to jail. He hasn't a clue about how our nation works.
We stopped being a Constitutional Republic in 1804 when Thomas Jefferson was president. For 198 years we have been a Democracy tempered by judical fiat.
This man is asking judges to rule that they don't have power to RULE. The RULE is he goes to JAIL.
Go Stanley!!!!
God's speed, Mr. Stanley.