Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/26/2002 2:02:45 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: CFW
This possibility is why the borough consistently refuses to vote for unification with the city. It comes up every 2-3 years and always loses, and probably always will.
32 posted on 07/26/2002 5:14:01 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
Wallner said that they have had the right since the 1960s to inspect the inside of the home if they had a petition that was signed by five neighbors.

A petition by 5 neighbors cancels the Fourth Amendment?

You mean I and 4 neighbors can terrorize anyone we want with impunity?

Now, that could be fun.

39 posted on 07/26/2002 9:23:09 PM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
Interesting Land Use plan. Here in PA it's called a Comprehensive Plan, but calls for pretty much the same thing. The PA Smart Growth Inititative, with Growing Greener funding (Former Gov Tom Ridge's projects) are funding, encouraging and hoping to require these same regulations in every county and community in PA.

In the Centre Region (home to PSU) we've had some of this for years, but of course it isn't enough. We've had a rental inspection program for probably 30 years, and in fact it's turned into a 'tool' for neighbors and disgruntled renters to get back at property owners with. You pay for the rental permit every year, then are on the list for "random" inspections. I've been really amazed at how many widows (husband was the landlord) come up on the list for random inpsections within a year of their bereavement...

For our latest comprehensive plan update, they want to require more alternative transportation, get more control of landscaping, and require the exterior with Natural Materials and non-reflective glass. Oh, and for new construction, they want no building on hilltops, no building on slopes, and no building on farm-fields! We've been working at getting the citizens informed about what these plans include, since when people KNOW, they OPPOSE! It's just mostly done behind closed doors, with the final project (and price-tag) presented to the community.

It all seems pretty unconstitutional to me... but few have the $$$ to challenge it. A few of us intrepid local Freepers are organizing though, and standing up for our rights - leaving local government officials pretty surprised!
42 posted on 07/29/2002 3:15:34 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson