Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOLD PLUMMETS - SPOT CHART
http://www.kitco.com/charts/livegold.html ^

Posted on 07/24/2002 8:29:42 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo

Source: www.kitco.com



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: goldprice; whoops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-342 next last
To: discostu
Wasn't looking for the overall value. Was looking to show you how much "a few ounces" actually weighs in your pocket all day.

It would weigh a few ounces. A quarter ounce gold coin and a few small coins of silver would be a hundred dollars.

Paper money works great without a government. Paper dollars, like all currency throughout history, are backed by belief of the people, not by force of the government.

Tell me which country uses paper money that isn't issued by a government.

You should spend a little time south of the border, the number one currency in Latin America is Yanqui Dollars even when the government specifically outlaws them (which Panama did under Noriega). Everybody likes them, and they don't tend to like the local currency.

They're depending on the U.S. government.

221 posted on 07/24/2002 4:43:55 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
There's lots of gold in the U.S. too; the enviro-crats just won't let anybody mine it.
222 posted on 07/24/2002 4:48:48 PM PDT by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: discostu
But carrying real gold sucks. It's heavy and hard to transport.

How much are you going to spent every day? LOL A half-ounce gold coin is 150 dollars.

One of the big problems Rome had was moving gold all over the empire, the stuff is just too heavy.

Um, Rome had a hard time moving anything around the empire, there were no trucks or cars then.

And, of course, you're living in complete ignorance of the current economic situation. Check, credit cards and electronic transfers account for the vast majority of monetary exchanges now, people don't even carry nice light foldable paper money and you want us to go back to annoying heavy pocket tearing gold coins.

Where did I say let's go back to gold? I've said nothing of the sort. I'm just pointing out your errors on gold.

Talk about living in the past.

I pay for things with cash, checks, and credit cards. They're fine as long as the governments backing them are stable. Intelligent people should have enough gold to live on for a few months stashed somewhere, though.

223 posted on 07/24/2002 4:51:00 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: discostu
now you're retreading.

Retreating from what?

It's also a fact that every gold based currency in the world has eventually collapsed.

Physical gold has always been worth a lot somewhere.

That's what happens, societies rise, societies fall, and with them go their economies, and the form of their currency has no significant impact on that cycle.

Tell that to the Germans of 1923. Show me where in history gold hyperinflated.

224 posted on 07/24/2002 4:53:26 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: discostu
not only do you need more practice with a tape measure, you also need more practice with basic math. 130x130x20 gives a total space of 338000 cubic feet, a full 5000 cupic feet smaller than your original "measurement".

131x131x20 then. Feel better?

225 posted on 07/24/2002 4:56:09 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: discostu
California gold rush, different animal here. The ship thing was part of Spanish colonialism.

You claimed that a shipload of gold couldn't pay a sailor's salery. As yet, I've seen no proof of this claim.

And if you read the link you'll see that part of the gold rush included a significant increase in the population as well as run-a-way inflation.

There were only 15000 people in San Fransisco. If this is the only example you can come up with, you're claim fails.

226 posted on 07/24/2002 4:58:41 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Actually Poohbah is right about gold leading to inflation that caused Spains downfall.

I believe that free gold made them lazy.

The first exploratory Spanish forays into South America were not always unfriendly ones - indeed they brought gifts of agricultural tools of iron, and also 'many beads, many combs, knives and scissors, coloured hats, caps, and shirts finely worked at the neck' to trade with the natives. But immediately they found gold and, fuelled by the story of 'El Dorado' (the Gilded One), started their quest for its pillage which was to last centuries. Expeditions crisscrossed the land and the gold was shipped back to Spain to be melted down for coin - coin that was to cause inflation for the whole of Europe and which was to lead to Spain's relegation to a minor power. The chronicles of those expeditions described the gold producing areas of the time.

Yes there will be inflation and deflation, but show me where there's been hyperinflation for a significant population.

Title: Gold-smithing in South America at the time of the Spanish Conquest. a link: http://www.lamp.ac.uk/tairona/a6goldsmith.html Inflation = There was too much gold chasing not enough goods.

Too much stealing, not enough work.

227 posted on 07/24/2002 5:02:11 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Then you must not have seen "that" history channel show. Spain was destroyed by gold because the massive importing of gold had the exact same effect as Germany's mass printing of currency.

You keep making this claim, but you offer no proof. Prove to me there was hyperinflation of the gold price in the 1500s for a significant population.

Gold (like all money, and lots of stuff that's never been money) is a commodity, the more there is the less valuable it would is. That's why the usual accusation around here when the price of gold takes a plunge is "dumping", people suspect that there is now a higher quantity of gold on the market being sold which thus drags down the value.

Yes, there will be inflation and deflation. Show me where in history there's been hyperinflation of the gold price for a significant population.

228 posted on 07/24/2002 5:05:21 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Trust them college boys to be good at research. I owe you one.

What research? There's always been inflation and deflation. I've seen no proof of hyperinflation of the price of gold.


229 posted on 07/24/2002 5:07:08 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: discostu
The California Gold Rush stuff has NOTHING to do with the Spanish Colonial stuff ...

Then why did you offer it as proof that a shipload of gold couldn't pay a sailor's salary.

(where the ship statement came from) except as FURTHER proof that a massive influx of gold, just like a massive influx of any other currency, will screw up an economy.

Inflation will screw with an economy, yes. We saw that with our fiat currency in 1979. So you think there some magical gold mine somewhere that we have just happened to overlook the last 500 years?

15000 people was big back then.

But it's not a nation. Our nation had 30 million people then.

And if you'd actually read some of these links you'd see that these economic problems hit the entirity of Californi, and spanish Colonial importing of gold totally screwed up Spain and adversly affected all of Europe.

Free money screws people up, no doubt about it. But gold has always been valuable somewhere.

Face it, you've lost. Massive influx of any currency, including gold, is bad.

Yep, we've seen that with our fiat currency too lately, haven't we? 200-1 PEs. LOL

230 posted on 07/24/2002 5:14:13 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
-- Gold does not have any intrinsic value. It only get's it value from what people emotionally attach to it.
-- The worth of monies is based on the economies that it is derived from. If the economy suffers so does the the value of it's currency.
-- Anything can be used for money from tiddlywinks to marbles.
-- People have this nostalgic attachment to gold thinking it is a panacea in case of rough times. Gold has seen its heyday. The gold backed currency is obsolete for today’s evolving modern economies.
231 posted on 07/24/2002 5:24:56 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Thanks for the heads up. (Does this make you Gold Pinger?)
232 posted on 07/24/2002 5:41:16 PM PDT by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
I didn't. I mentioned the California Gold Rush as ANOTHER example of a massive influx of gold screwing things up. You asked for links on that assertion, I gave them to you. Two seperate things related only by the material being influxed and the negative reaction of the local economy.

It took until 1848 for the gold in California to be found. Siberia is supposed to have massive levels of almost every precious metal and mineral that nobody's quite sure how to get to thanks to the permafrost. So can there be a gold mine we've overlooked for 5000 years? You bet.

OK finally you admit that a massive influx of gold can be bad. Then you act like you knew it all the time. Well if you knew it all the time then why have we been arguing for 2 dozen posts?! And 200-1 PEs has nothing to do with an influx of cash, it has to do with an influx of wealth and stock being traded as a commodity instead of as a percentage of ownership. This caused the value of stock to be whatever somebody would pay for it rather than the more traditional how much can you earn from it.
233 posted on 07/24/2002 5:44:41 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
You're playing fast and lose with definitions. "A few ounces" is a lot more than you think when you're actually carrying it all day. When you do a day with 20 quarters in your pocket you'll understand, until then you're just being annoying.

In the course of American history we've used a number of currencies with no backing or even participation by the American government. Recent examples include Camel Cash, Marlboro Miles, airline points and S&H Greenstamps. Then of course there's the popularity of yanqui dollars in the third world inspite of the government issued money. Of course part of your problem is that you think "gvoernment backing" has any meaning at all. It doesn't. The government cannot force you to accept the currency, if you won't take it you won't take it. Most fastfood places won't take bills bigger than $20, they don't want to make the change or carry the theft risk. People in third world countries aren't depending on our government for the value of a dollar, they're depending on other people's willingness to take the dollar in exchange for goods or services. Currency has always gotten it's value from use and never from the government.
234 posted on 07/24/2002 5:51:41 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
So when in post 201 you said that if people carried real gold the government wouldn't have been able to print excess money with no backing that wasn't saying that we should?! Get real. You're off in never never land and contradicting yourself.
235 posted on 07/24/2002 5:54:06 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Retread, not retreat. You know, like retreaded tires. It means you're going over the same ground which we've already shown is defenseless, your arguement is becoming circular in nature.

Who cares if the gold is valuable "somewhere"? The economy still collapsed. The way things currently work in the third world yanqui dollars look like they'll always be valuable "somewhere", doesn't stop you from saying they're no good.

We've shown you where in history there's been hyperinflation due to gold: Gold Rush California and Colonial Spain (and via Spain the rest of Europe though since the gold wasn't landing in their economy first they just had regular bad inflation not hyperinflation).
236 posted on 07/24/2002 5:57:36 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
220 cubic feet over but we're getting closer. When you're talking about filling the entire space with gold every cubic foot represents a lot of money. One must be precise.
237 posted on 07/24/2002 5:59:41 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Actually it was DEFLATION of the gold "price", the gold lost value and so became worthless. When the form of currency loses value that's called inflation. But when you're talking about a commodity (which is doubling as a currency) losing value the actual price is deflating.

If you can't accept that all of Spain is a "significant population" then there's no point in this discussion continuing because it becomes obvious at that point that you've got your sacred cow and it cannot be shaken regardless of the fact presented.
238 posted on 07/24/2002 6:03:41 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Gold does not have any intrinsic value. It only get's it value from what people emotionally attach to it.

You guys need to make up your mind. First you say it's a commodity, then you say it's just an emotional object. There will always be someone somewhere willing to pay good money for it, so it does have intrinsic value. Not true with paper. History has shown over and over that paper money almost always goes worthless.

-- The worth of monies is based on the economies that it is derived from. If the economy suffers so does the the value of it's currency.

But the good thing about gold is that it has value all over the world, it isn't dependent on one government or one economy.

-- Anything can be used for money from tiddlywinks to marbles.

Then why aren't they?

-- People have this nostalgic attachment to gold thinking it is a panacea in case of rough times. Gold has seen its heyday. The gold backed currency is obsolete for today’s evolving modern economies.

$310 for a tiny coin. I'd say the heyday hasn't ended yet.

239 posted on 07/24/2002 6:11:08 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I didn't. I mentioned the California Gold Rush as ANOTHER example of a massive influx of gold screwing things up.

I asked for a link that a shipload of gold couldn't pay a sailor's salary and you said look at the California gold rush.

You asked for links on that assertion, I gave them to you. Two seperate things related only by the material being influxed and the negative reaction of the local economy.

A small town.

It took until 1848 for the gold in California to be found. Siberia is supposed to have massive levels of almost every precious metal and mineral that nobody's quite sure how to get to thanks to the permafrost. So can there be a gold mine we've overlooked for 5000 years? You bet.

If it's so easy, then why aren't they getting it?

OK finally you admit that a massive influx of gold can be bad.

To the population stealing it, yes. Stealing is bad.

Then you act like you knew it all the time. Well if you knew it all the time then why have we been arguing for 2 dozen posts?!

I've never denied inflation and deflation, I've been asking for proof that the gold price hyperinflated to the point that a shipload wouldn't pay a sailor's salary, as you claimed.

And 200-1 PEs has nothing to do with an influx of cash, it has to do with an influx of wealth and stock being traded as a commodity instead of as a percentage of ownership.

It takes a lot of cash and derivitives to drive up to 200-1PEs.

This caused the value of stock to be whatever somebody would pay for it rather than the more traditional how much can you earn from it.

Yep, it's the same as with the Spanish, we exchanged free money (printed paper), for goods from foraign countries causing distubances in our stock prices, just like the Spanish exchanged stolen money for goods causing distubances in their economy.

240 posted on 07/24/2002 6:19:39 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-342 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson