Replies

From a normally leftie mag, an excellent article on why the West risks being destroyed by Islamic immigrants.

Then, in September 2001 (only five days, in fact, before the destruction of the World Trade Center), the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet reported that 65 percent of rapes of Norwegian women were performed by "non-Western" immigrants–a category that, in Norway, consists mostly of Muslims. The article quoted a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo (who was described as having "lived for many years in Muslim countries") as saying that "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes" because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. One reason for the high number of rapes by Muslims, explained the professor, was that in their native countries "rape is scarcely punished," since Muslims "believe that it is women who are responsible for rape." The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: "Norwegian women must realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it."

This sums it up:

As for those who, after a period in the West, make it obvious that they are unwilling or unable to adapt, they must be sent home and replaced by deserving individuals who can adapt. This may appear extreme, but there is no reasonable alternative. For at stake in all this, ultimately, are the basic freedoms of all Westerners–not only women and homosexuals, but everyone, including Muslims and former Muslims who wish to live in a place where they can be themselves. At stake, indeed, is Western civilization.

I find it very telling that the Homosexuals/Liberals will denounce fundamentalist ideas of morality in Christianity, yet embrace the fundamentalist ideas of morality in Islam saying that perhaps the spiritual values will be a help against raging capitalism. Yet the laws of Islam are far more harsh.

The very values they are trying to wipe out under the name of God, they embrace under Satan. No matter how they protest they want freedom, they embrace the same laws in slavery. They do not understand the spiritual basis of that slavery, yet passionately embrace their destruction, leading the charge with rainbow banners flying, like lemmings rushing over the cliff.

This is a battle of intent hidden in issues.

After all this time listening to the Palestinians demand they want land, while killing Jews and Christians, then refuse that land, to kill Jews and Christians, I have come to the conclusion that the Issues are just wordy smoke screens for the gullible but the intent is shown by actions not words.

The intent is to destroy the Christians and the Jews, and unite the world under the banner of Satan. The word Diversity is the perfect example: Diversity in the dictionary means to be diverse, to allow all views. But Diversity in the mouths of liberalism means All views EXCLUDING Judeao/Christian ones.

The battle shapes up under a cloud of lies, the smoke screen of the father of lies. But it is a spiritual battle non the less. Most of mankind will pick a banner to follow, a cause to celebrate, few will contemplate the meanings beyond the color of the cloth. The intellectually dishonest will choose a cause that excuses their sin, or pads their pockets over others. Homosexuality, black pride are two examples.

Homosexuality attacks Christianity because Christians do not accept homosexuality. Why should the Homosexuals care? Homosexuals do not accept Christianity either. But under the banner of Diversity they attack Christianity?

Black Pride is about greed. It is about attacking the culture of America to make it bleed perks and cash bonuses because the blacks feel disenfranchised. It is not about America it is about becoming black-American to demand the American part pay. But if Black pride was about the pride of being a human being that was not disenfranchised it would not be called BLACK-pride now would it?

Each and every banner can be examined and most unraveled in seconds if you just follow the sin, greed and power... All banners however are marching in a single direction, away from the teachings of the Bible. Someone observant would notice that there is a direction, but that someone would have to understand the Bible in the first place. What seems to be a plate of spaghetti of conflicting ideas is all buried in the sauce of reality. It is, after all, just a plate of spaghetti.

If you want to see the direction, I suggest one thing. Instead of trying to understand every path of conflicting ideas, just look at them as a whole and deduce the direction they all are going. Instead of trying to embrace and understand the ideas they yell to the winds, just simply look at the ideas they all in common reject. In a thousand to one battle, to understand the one is to understand the thousand, and much easier…