Posted on 07/23/2002 11:45:02 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:55:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
One of the contributing factors to the market meltdown is the bearish policy environment in Washington
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
And thats just where it belongs...in retreat! Its dammed near destroyed this once great country!
That's silly.
American consumers enjoying the option of buying a Swiss-made watch, a Japanese-made watch, or an American-made watch never hurt this Nation one bit.
Looks like the globalist free traitors at the Cato Institute are trying to reinvigorate their convoluted, revisionist and totally discredited theories regarding the Smoot-Hawley tariff.
Smoot-Hawley wasn't enacted until 1930, AFTER the market crash of '29.
Furthermore, trade only amounted to 6% of GNP at the time and declined to 2% of GNP by 1932. The bulk of this decline is directly attributable to the 31% decline in GNP and 25% unemployment rate precipitated by the market crash. The effects of Smoot-Hawley, which only applied to 1/3 of imports, were negligible in comparison.
Of course, as is characteristic of revisionism, the dimbulbs at the Cato Institute prefer to distort facts to suit their own political agenda.
I doubt it. The purpose is to buy enough labor votes
to get back into office. The fact that, according to
Rush Limbaugh and others, six times as many jobs
were lost in other sectors as were saved in the steel
industry falls on deaf ears. The job losers won't know
who to blame, labor will still vote democrat, we
pay more for steel, and the stock market tanks.
Not to mention counter-tariffs by our trading
partners that will hurt other industries.
But that's the difference between conservatives
and Republicans. Conservatives have principles.
Republicans have will to power.
"Fair Trade" is nothing more than the Government keeping Taxes and Regulation low enough that Domestic producers can out-produce competitors. It has nothing whatsoever to do with an insane, Interventionist Welfare State attempting to "control" Trade via Punitive Tariffs. If your Domestic Taxes and Regulation destroy your Domestic Production base, all that Punitive Tariffs accomplish is to keep you from importing anything either.
If Domestic Industry is being starved by High Taxes and Regulation, it does no good to institutionalize their disadvantages by erecting Tariff Walls. It's the taxes and regulation, stupid. "Protect" a starving man by building walls around him, but continue to deprive him of food, and he will still starve to death behind those "protective" walls.
Protectionists should stop drooling in their shoes, "Tariffs good... tariffs good...." and work for lower Domestic Taxes -- not higher Trade Taxes, of all the stupid, anti-capitalist, and (quite literally) counter-productive ideas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.