So then you can't answer the question? I assumed as much...
No answer. Obviously, you are a 'states rights' devotee, but won't admit it. -- Why?
Really, now - if you're going to play both sides of this discussion, you don't need me, do you?
Maybe cause you can't rationalize being clearly against the constitution? Strange beliefs, imo.
For someone who bitches as much as you do about people reading into his posts, you sure are quick to do it to others. I've never said anything like that, and I highly doubt you can make anything resembling a cogent case to show that I did.
That being said, I'll try again. Are you familiar with Gideon v Wainwright?
Why?
(ignoring the gratuitous foolishness)
Because I'm trying to make a point here. However, I'm not about to teach an entire course in Constitutional law to do it, so I'd like to find out what you do know. And then we can proceed from there.