[Burr5]

Your "points" defending Alex Jones:
1). Cite me a source for that one.
2). "Partially true", you say. Completely deceptive misdirection I say.
3). But does Shippers suggest the NWO were out to destroy the WTC?
4). Even you admit this one is a "stretch".
5). This notorious "Northwood Document" is from 19freaking62!
6). Even A.E. Pritchard goes out of his way to say that this is nonesense.
7). Is it unconstitutional? Maybe. Have we ever faced an enemy like this one? No. These questions are why we have the Supremes.
8). How exactly do our (not exactly!) "WIDE OPEN" borders suggest that George W. Bush wanted 9-11 to happen?
9). You admit, again, that this one is "something of a stretch".
10). "The cashless society". Worry about the "Mark of the Beast" if you want to. It does nothing to support the allegations Jones is making.

I think "the case", as you've presented it, with your help on all the crucial points, has been refuted.

[kennyo]

I think "the case", as you've presented it, with your help on all the crucial points, has been refuted.

Huh???

[TruBluKentuckian]

I've seen the Alex Jones video, and it's hilarious. I love how it's promoted as "documented proof", when his documentation consists of "it is said that" and "it's documented that"... no cites... except of course for the infamous "Northwoods Document" which not only came out in 1962, but has been proven, by the author, to be a hoax he and others wrote as a joke. For Jones to continue to cite that "document" as proof of his claims just shows how desperate he is for documentation of his false claims.