Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dubyagee
But if man is only truly alive and good when he is true to himself and his virtue, how can evil exist?

Man is a rational animal. When he is no longer rational he becomes evil.

"To know one's own desires, their meaning and their costs requires the highest human virtue: rationality." - Ayn Rand.

17 posted on 07/22/2002 4:49:31 PM PDT by Lev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lev
Man is a rational animal. When he is no longer rational he becomes evil.

What causes man to become irrational?

18 posted on 07/22/2002 4:52:31 PM PDT by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Lev
Man is a rational animal. When he is no longer rational he becomes evil.

Stalin, Mao and Lex Luther were all perfectly rational (but for most, evil) people.

21 posted on 07/22/2002 4:57:00 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Lev
When he is no longer rational he becomes evil.

So, there have been no evil men who were entirely rational? I don't think so Lev.

Its obvious that the antithesis of evil is good. Why fight it?

26 posted on 07/22/2002 4:58:26 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Lev
"To know one's own desires, their meaning and their costs requires the highest human virtue: rationality." - Ayn Rand.

This is the biggest piece of Randish poppycock (and not incidentally, the centerpiece of her 'rational' thought)! First, to know one's desires has nothing to do with rationality. A pedophile likes to have sex with kids. He knows his desires just fine. A selfish person likes not to share his toys with others. He knows his desires just fine. Neither needs to emply rationality to understand those desires. And as for rationality being the highest virtue - Rand exposes herself here. If you have some scale of virtue that you can measure rationality with, you then have some morality outside of rationality. Finally, rationality can be used for good or for evil. It is neutral to good and evil. Rand desperately wants there to be no good or evil that can't be discerned through the use of reason, and she tries (in vain) to use reason to prove her point. It's like trying to prove the fourth dimension can't exist using only three.

33 posted on 07/22/2002 5:05:45 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson