Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee
"Your dogmatic insistence as to his guilt does you no credit."

And you could say the same thing about the DW not guilty crowd , but I must say this. My viewpoint (and many others too) is that the prosecution so far has not proven DW guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. They haven't even come close. This is, I feel, a reasonably well informed opinion. I have no idea what the jury will actually decide.

If I am wrong, I am wrong. If tomorrow evidence was presented that showed DW was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, I would be as insistent they punish him to the maximum extent of the law as you.

If, tomorrow, the produce info showing he is NOT GUILTY, beyond a shadow of a doubt, WHAT WILL YOU DO ?

609 posted on 07/22/2002 9:30:25 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
I think you mixed up your cutnpaste quote from someone else, but that's okay.

If he's proven not guilty fine. They just have to explain away the DNA, fingerprints, fibers, kiddie porn, RV journey, laundry etc etc.

Against all that you have the paid bug men. Good grief.

626 posted on 07/22/2002 9:37:31 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson