[Travis McGee]

I think you mixed up your cutnpaste quote from someone else, but that's okay.

If he's proven not guilty fine. They just have to explain away the DNA, fingerprints, fibers, kiddie porn, RV journey, laundry etc etc.

Against all that you have the paid bug men. Good grief.

[Rheo]

That first paid bug man was hired by the prosecution..if his findings would have supported the state's case instead..would he still just be a paid bug man or would he have credibility in your eyes?

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Against all that you have the paid bug men.

Guess what, Travis? The DNA experts made 46K for their part. I guess that makes them tainted too?

[UCANSEE2]

Let's just see what happens the next two days. OK?

I didn't cut and paste wrong, you just have proved to me you don't read all the posts, you just kinda skip around.

If you had followed all the replies to you, would would have understood.

ANyway, doesn't matter, let's just see what tomorrow brings.

[Jaded]

The State of Kalifornia paid Mitchell Holland of Bodie Technology $50,000 for the exact same testimony that the local lab provided.

Faulkner is a local.

[meadsjn]

Against all that you have the paid bug men. Good grief.

The first paid bug man was hired by the prosecutor. His investigation was done and his report prepared while he was working for the prosecution. His findings didn't match the prosecution theory, so Dusek didn't enter his report into evidence. The defense did. The second bug man used different techniques, but arrived at a time-frame only slightly shorter than that of the first report, but neither fit the prosecutor's (and police) contention that the body was dumped on Feb 2.

I don't know what the SD media is saying, but it surely doesn't match the transcripts.