Replies

Having seen too many of your other posts, I am saddened that you are losing your credibility by this knee-jerk reaction that DW is guilty BEFORE all the evidence is in. I have felt from the beginning that he MIGHT be the one and should fry if so, but from what I can see, there is considerable room for doubt right now, so I can only wait and see. I will NOT say so blindly that he HAS to be guilty until I can see all the evidence which has yet to finish being presented. True, I have not been following this daily as some have, but I do not have to be so thoroughly dogmatic as to his guilt. Those who insist on it despite any mitigating testimony lose credibility real fast. You may be right, but I can't say that I would vote to convict based on what I have heard so far. That is exactly why we have the PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE in our Constitution... and a damned good thing, too! Else we'd all be in danger of being railroaded at the whim of a lazy/vengeful prosecution/investigator. And being FReepers would ensure that SOME would try to railroad us... then the US could officially become just like the Eurotrash we despise for their Napoleonic-style, YOU_PROVE_YOUR_INNOCENCE school of justice. No, thanks.

Blablablabla.

Isn't it funny that those of us in SD who are getting 5X more info than you have come to the conclusion that DW is guilty as sin?

Gee, it must comfort you, (tons of physical evidence aside) to be defending someone with THOUSANDS of (cataloged and titled and sorted into personal files) porno images on his computer, focusing on KIDDIE PORN and actual VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEOS.

Some hero for you to hold up!