[Travis McGee]

Blablablabla.

Isn't it funny that those of us in SD who are getting 5X more info than you have come to the conclusion that DW is guilty as sin?

Gee, it must comfort you, (tons of physical evidence aside) to be defending someone with THOUSANDS of (cataloged and titled and sorted into personal files) porno images on his computer, focusing on KIDDIE PORN and actual VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEOS.

Some hero for you to hold up!

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Travis......we are usually on the same side, but I beg to differ.

I live in SD County too and I don't think he's guilty. I even have a family member in LE and don't think he's guilty. Reason: It has not been proven

I have followed practically every minute of the trial.

I have a family full of extremely pro-LE members (all SD County residents) and none of us think he's guilty, though the cop-kin hasn't weighed in either way.

[dcwusmc]

Have I stated that I held him up as a hero? Not likely. What I said was that, not having followed the trial daily, I could not, based on what I CURRENTLY KNOW, vote to convict. That I would have to WAIT UNTIL ALL THE EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED, not prejudge the case. Perhaps he IS the one. I DON'T KNOW and on what I have seen presented so far, I could not vote to convict. I also mentioned PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, to which each of us is entitled. Your dogmatic insistence as to his guilt does you no credit.

[John Jamieson]

"tons of physical evidence" that will fit nicely in a thimble and $3.50 worth of dirty pictures do not prove murder.

[UCANSEE2]

See that you are getting emotional over this. Happens to everyone.

You trust the TV, the newspaper, Ken and John on the radio or whatever their names are, then you find out the BIASED (lied) the story to MAKE MONEY. They don't care if an innocent person goes to jail or is executed, as long as the MAKE MONEY OFF OF IT. If you think I am wrong, why are Networks itching to put an ELECTROCUTION on TV ?

IT SELLS!

The closer you are to the SITUATION, the less you can see of the WHOLE THING. No one blames you or is trying to say you are not intelligent.

What I am saying and others are is that maybe you have only gotten some very biased information to date.

The harder we work to help inform you , the harder you seem to resist. As another poster already said to you,

"Your dogmatic insistence as to his guilt does you no credit."

[Jaded]

focusing on KIDDIE PORN and actual VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEOS.

That is absolutely AMAZING, TM. Funny that's not in the transcripts. The transcripts are on the UT site. Read them.

[Dave_in_Upland]

Isn't it funny that those of us in SD who are getting 5X more info than you have come to the conclusion that DW is guilty as sin? Gee, it must comfort you, (tons of physical evidence aside) to be defending someone with THOUSANDS of (cataloged and titled and sorted into personal files) porno images on his computer, focusing on KIDDIE PORN and actual VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEOS.

Evididently that 5X is mostly wrong LOL With every post you make you prove that you actually know less and less about the actual evidence.