[VRWC_minion]

Not DNA testing?

We are talking ABSOLUTE here. DNA isn't absolute. Even if it were we still have other problems like collection, chain of custody etc.

If the standard were absolute proof, no one could ever be convicted of anything.

[NatureGirl]

DNA isn't absolute. Even if it were we still have other problems like collection, chain of custody etc

Thank you. After following this today, I'm glad that we have reached this point. I don't expect absolute proof. My whole point has been that, if the two bug "experts" testimony/science can be doubted, then there is reason to believe that any other "expert" who has testified can be doubted, as well, for the reasons given - collection, chain of custody, which tests were done/not done, experience, etc, plus "margin for error".