To: VRWC_minion
DNA isn't absolute. Even if it were we still have other problems like collection, chain of custody etc
Thank you. After following this today, I'm glad that we have reached this point. I don't expect absolute proof. My whole point has been that, if the two bug "experts" testimony/science can be doubted, then there is reason to believe that any other "expert" who has testified can be doubted, as well, for the reasons given - collection, chain of custody, which tests were done/not done, experience, etc, plus "margin for error".
To: NatureGirl
I don't expect absolute proofSomeone here does.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson