To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
She has been in the front row watching the jusdge, lawyers, DW, the jurors etc at close range from day one.
She said that Dusek has dimantled the 2nd bug man just as he wrecked the first bug man as determined by JUROR REACTION, rolling their eyes, lack of note taking, smirking at the bug man's testimony etc.
I'm not there, I am only passing on what she, a JUROR EYE WITNESS, has been saying. It wasn't just the expert witness fees, she is saying that AS SEEN IN JUROR REACTION, Dusek has shredded the certainty of the bug life time lines, and put in so much doubt that the jurors are basically laughing at the bug men.
To: Travis McGee
Very interesting.
To: Travis McGee
The prosecution has used the 1st bug man about 200 times...was he more credible then?
305 posted on
07/22/2002 6:01:41 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: Travis McGee
We need a new legal system wherein the jury never gets to actually vote. The PRESS watches their faces for us and tell us what the jury is thinking instead. Yah, that'll work.
To: Travis McGee
Has Dusek yet explained why there was no evidence of
Westerfield in the VD home?
314 posted on
07/22/2002 6:07:46 PM PDT by
crypt2k
To: Travis McGee
WRT:River explanation..thank you for that..
To: Travis McGee
Dusek wants to bring in Goff and expects the jury to believe him. Dusek can't have it both ways.
406 posted on
07/22/2002 7:01:42 PM PDT by
Jaded
To: Travis McGee
I'm not there, I am only passing on what she, a JUROR EYE WITNESS, has been saying. Therein lies your own the answer to your own question. Can you see the answer,my friend.
To: Travis McGee
I'm not there, I am only passing on what she, a JUROR EYE WITNESS, has been saying. It wasn't just the expert witness fees, she is saying that AS SEEN IN JUROR REACTION, Dusek has shredded the certainty of the bug life time lines, and put in so much doubt that the jurors are basically laughing at the bug men.
I find that report highly suspect! Did anyone hear Jon & Ken from KFI in Los Angeles right after 5:00 pm today? Well, I did and ended up yelling at the radio!! They were practically accusing, NO! I take that back, they WERE accusing the bug man (I'm so angry I forgot his name right now) of testifying, for money, to whatever the defense wanted! They also said that Duseck creamed the guy!! They also said that because of the recent Samantha case in Orange County, Westerfield will surely fry! What arrogant a$$holes!! What testimony were THEY listening to!
I don't believe any of this crap. The reporters who wanted Westerfield executed are seeing "their" case disintegrate right before their very eyes! John and Ken were really bothered by the way the testimony went today. Well, tooooo bad!
They are truely pathetic. Real "honest" reporting. Yeah, right!
Dear God, let the truth prevail!
459 posted on
07/22/2002 7:43:47 PM PDT by
It's me
To: Travis McGee
I'm not there, I am only passing on what she, a JUROR EYE WITNESS, has been saying. It wasn't just the expert witness fees, she is saying that AS SEEN IN JUROR REACTION, Dusek has shredded the certainty of the bug life time lines, and put in so much doubt that the jurors are basically laughing at the bug men. Could it be that the jurors are actually "basically laughing at Dusek"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson